243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9685767)
1. The effects of different storage conditions on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
Purk JH; Willes MG; Tira DE; Eick JD; Hung SH
J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jul; 129(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 9685767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material.
Endo T; Finger WJ
Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16429703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of disinfection with peracetic acid and hypochlorite in dimensional alterations of casts obtained from addition silicone and polyether impressions.
Queiroz DA; Peçanha MM; Neves AC; Frizzera F; Tonetto MR; Silva-Concílio LR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1100-5. PubMed ID: 24858758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of reheating on the accuracy of addition silicone putty-wash impressions.
Tjan AH; Li T
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 2072314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials.
Corso M; Abanomy A; Di Canzio J; Zurakowski D; Morgano SM
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 9627890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
Millstein P; Maya A; Segura C
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
Chang WG; Vahidi F; Bae KH; Lim BS
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of frequency and amplitude of vibration on void formation in dies poured from polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
Abdullah MA
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):490-4. PubMed ID: 9791799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy of some impression materials.
Jagger DC; Al Jabra O; Harrison A; Vowles RW; McNally L
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Dec; 12(4):154-60. PubMed ID: 15691188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of the Association Between the Tray and Impression Techniques on Angulated Implants Using the All-on-Four System.
de Avila ED; Castanharo SM; Casalle N; Vasconcelos JA; de Assis Mollo F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():382-5. PubMed ID: 24641165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro study of transmission of bacteria from contaminated metal models to stone models via impressions.
Sofou A; Larsen T; Owall B; Fiehn NE
Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Sep; 6(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 12271350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
