171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9685824)
1. Sensitivity and specificity of computer-assisted breast cancer detection in mammography screening.
Thurfjell E; Thurfjell MG; Egge E; Bjurstam N
Acta Radiol; 1998 Jul; 39(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 9685824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aspects in mammographic screening. Detection, prediction, recurrence and prognosis.
Thurfjell MG
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2001 Dec; 42(424):1-22. PubMed ID: 12040855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Boetes C; Flobbe K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 19418215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: does it help the junior or the senior radiologist?
Balleyguier C; Kinkel K; Fermanian J; Malan S; Djen G; Taourel P; Helenon O
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 54(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 15797297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues.
Baker JA; Lo JY; Delong DM; Floyd CE
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 15358850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standalone computer-aided detection compared to radiologists' performance for the detection of mammographic masses.
Hupse R; Samulski M; Lobbes M; den Heeten A; Imhof-Tas MW; Beijerinck D; Pijnappel R; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 22772149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography.
Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1475-82. PubMed ID: 17114540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does computer-aided detection assist in the early detection of breast cancer?
Hukkinen K; Pamilo M
Acta Radiol; 2005 Apr; 46(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 15902887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography.
Watanabe AT; Lim V; Vu HX; Chim R; Weise E; Liu J; Bradley WG; Comstock CE
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):625-637. PubMed ID: 31011956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.
Georgian-Smith D; Moore RH; Halpern E; Yeh ED; Rafferty EA; D'Alessandro HA; Staffa M; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; Kopans DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 17954651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic computer-aided detection systems.
Health Devices; 2003 Apr; 32(4):141-64. PubMed ID: 12760158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection.
The JS; Schilling KJ; Hoffmeister JW; Friedmann E; McGinnis R; Holcomb RG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 19155392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
