168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9685824)
41. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: false-positive marks and their reproducibility in negative mammograms.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Seong MH; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):999-1004. PubMed ID: 19863409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting.
Birdwell RL; Bandodkar P; Ikeda DM
Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):451-7. PubMed ID: 16040901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.
Fenton JJ; Abraham L; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Carney PA; D'Orsi C; Elmore JG; Barlow WE;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Aug; 103(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 21795668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Kim SY; Chang JM; Kim SM; Cho N
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):482-90. PubMed ID: 20429765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study.
Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Blane C; Paramagul C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson S; Adler D; Nees A; Shen J
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 15317954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography.
Li L; Clark RA; Thomas JA
Acad Radiol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11918357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Implications of unchanged detection criteria with CAD as second reader of mammograms.
Bornefalk H
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):922-9. PubMed ID: 16696467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets.
Kim SH; Lee EH; Jun JK; Kim YM; Chang YW; Lee JH; Kim HW; Choi EJ;
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30672161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?
Al Mousa DS; Mello-Thoms C; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard R; Poulos A; Tan J; Li Y; Brennan PC
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1377-85. PubMed ID: 25097013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Bolivar AV; Gomez SS; Merino P; Alonso-Bartolomé P; Garcia EO; Cacho PM; Hoffmeister JW
Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1086-92. PubMed ID: 20883182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The efficacy of using computer-aided detection (CAD) for detection of breast cancer in mammography screening: a systematic review.
Henriksen EL; Carlsen JF; Vejborg IM; Nielsen MB; Lauridsen CA
Acta Radiol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 29665706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Breast cancer: importance of spiculation in computer-aided detection.
Vyborny CJ; Doi T; O'Shaughnessy KF; Romsdahl HM; Schneider AC; Stein AA
Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 10831688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support.
Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Rijken H; Holland R
Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S123-6. PubMed ID: 17209117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Radiologists' detection of mammographic abnormalities with and without a computer-aided detection system.
Quek ST; Thng CH; Khoo JB; Koh WL
Australas Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 12890245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
