These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9685824)

  • 61. [Is the application of CAD useful for radiologists for passing the official tests required for outpatient breast imaging?].
    Malich A; Beier A; Bank P; Gorna R
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 17203444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Retrospective analysis of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system in full-field digital mammography in correlation to tumor histology].
    Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1103-9. PubMed ID: 16021542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Reproducibility--an important factor determining the quality of computer-aided detection (CAD) systems.
    Malich A; Azhari T; Böhm T; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2000 Dec; 36(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 11091020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. An observer study comparing spot imaging regions selected by radiologists and a computer for an automated stereo spot mammography technique.
    Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Lydick JT; Gandra CR; Chen NG; Helvie MA; Bailey JE; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Sahiner B; Petrick NA
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1558-67. PubMed ID: 15259660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions.
    Kegelmeyer WP; Pruneda JM; Bourland PD; Hillis A; Riggs MW; Nipper ML
    Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 8153302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Computer-aided detection in mammography.
    Astley SM; Gilbert FJ
    Clin Radiol; 2004 May; 59(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 15081844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Improved mammographic CAD performance using multi-view information: a Bayesian network framework.
    Velikova M; Samulski M; Lucas PJ; Karssemeijer N
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(5):1131-47. PubMed ID: 19174596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Computer-aided detection of masses at mammography: interactive decision support versus prompts.
    Hupse R; Samulski M; Lobbes MB; Mann RM; Mus R; den Heeten GJ; Beijerinck D; Pijnappel RM; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 23091171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Effect of integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population screening trial: A descriptive study.
    Bernardi D; Li T; Pellegrini M; Macaskill P; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Houssami N
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():26-31. PubMed ID: 30150047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A study on two different CAD systems for mammography as an aid to radiological diagnosis in the search of microcalcification clusters.
    Lauria A; Palmiero R; Forni G; Fantacci ME; Imbriaco M; Sodano A; Indovina PL
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 16036158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Detection of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography.
    Murakami R; Kumita S; Tani H; Yoshida T; Sugizaki K; Kuwako T; Kiriyama T; Hakozaki K; Okazaki E; Yanagihara K; Iida S; Haga S; Tsuchiya S
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Aug; 26(4):768-73. PubMed ID: 23319110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Strategies for digital mammography interpretation in a clinical patient population.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
    Int J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 125(12):2923-9. PubMed ID: 19672861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devices.
    Taylor P; Given-Wilson RM
    Br J Radiol; 2005; 78 Spec No 1():S26-30. PubMed ID: 15917442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings.
    Zheng B; Ganott MA; Britton CA; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Chang TS; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 11719657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Features of prospectively overlooked computer-aided detection marks on prior screening digital mammograms in women with breast cancer.
    Cho N; Kim SJ; Choi HY; Lyou CY; Moon WK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1276-82. PubMed ID: 20966340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers.
    Dean JC; Ilvento CC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 16794150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Computer-aided diagnosis with temporal analysis to improve radiologists' interpretation of mammographic mass lesions.
    Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2010 May; 14(3):803-8. PubMed ID: 20403792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
    Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.