These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9686845)
1. Applanation tonometry and correction according to corneal thickness. Stodtmeister R Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Jun; 76(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 9686845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal population. Yagci R; Eksioglu U; Midillioglu I; Yalvac I; Altiparmak E; Duman S Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 15944999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Wolfs RC; Klaver CC; Vingerling JR; Grobbee DE; Hofman A; de Jong PT Am J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 123(6):767-72. PubMed ID: 9535620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Central corneal thickness in low-tension glaucoma. Emara BY; Tingey DP; Probst LE; Motolko MA Can J Ophthalmol; 1999 Oct; 34(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 10604052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Gunvant P; Baskaran M; Vijaya L; Joseph IS; Watkins RJ; Nallapothula M; Broadway DC; O'Leary DJ Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Apr; 88(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 15031169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and noncontact tonometry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Erdurmus M; Totan Y; Hepsen IF; Yagci R Eye (Lond); 2009 Mar; 23(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 18259205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Kniestedt C; Lin S; Choe J; Bostrom A; Nee M; Stamper RL Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 123(11):1532-7. PubMed ID: 16286615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness. Bron AM; Creuzot-Garcher C; Goudeau-Boutillon S; d'Athis P Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1999 Mar; 237(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 10090585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons of the Tono-Pen® and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Patients in a Hospital Population in Southwest Nigeria. Onochie C; Okoye O; Ogunro A; Aribaba T; Hassan K; Onakoya A Med Princ Pract; 2016; 25(6):566-571. PubMed ID: 27504638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers. Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Castillo A; Garcia-Sanchez J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4578-80. PubMed ID: 16303951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of central corneal thickness in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Thomas R; Korah S; Muliyil J Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Jun; 48(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 11116505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Kohlhaas M; Boehm AG; Spoerl E; Pürsten A; Grein HJ; Pillunat LE Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 124(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 16606871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry or Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry. Katsimpris JM; Theoulakis PE; Vasilopoulos K; Skourtis G; Papadopoulos GE; Petropoulos IK Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Apr; 232(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 25902089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Central corneal thickness measurements in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension. Ventura AC; Böhnke M; Mojon DS Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jul; 85(7):792-5. PubMed ID: 11423450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure by iCare rebound tonometer. Rao A; Kumar M; Prakash B; Varshney G J Glaucoma; 2014 Aug; 23(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 23221904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]