104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9689909)
1. List length and the bizarreness effect: support for a hybrid explanation.
Worthen JB; Marshall PH; Cox KB
Psychol Res; 1998; 61(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 9689909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The bizarreness effect: it's not surprising, it's complex.
McDaniel MA; Einstein GO; DeLosh EL; May CP; Brady P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):422-435. PubMed ID: 7738508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.
McDaniel MA; Dornburg CC; Guynn MJ
Mem Cognit; 2005 Mar; 33(2):270-9. PubMed ID: 16028582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ageing and secondary-distinctiveness-based effects: the orthographic distinctiveness effect is more robust than the bizarreness effect.
Gounden Y; Nicolas S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1820-32. PubMed ID: 22524538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aging, imagery, and the bizarreness effect.
Black SR; McCown S; Lookadoo RL; Leonard RC; Kelley M; DeCoster J; Wayde E; Spence SA
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012 Sep; 19(5):566-91. PubMed ID: 22248375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of processing time on the bizarreness and orthographic distinctiveness effects.
Gounden Y; Nicolas S
Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 22448903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material.
McDaniel MA; DeLosh EL; Merritt PS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):1045-56. PubMed ID: 10946377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of word frequency on recency effects in directed free recall.
Van Overschelde JP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):611-5. PubMed ID: 12109756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Part-list cuing can be transient and lasting: the role of encoding.
Bäuml KH; Aslan A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 16478338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three Semantic Serial Position Functions at the Same Time.
Neath I; Kelley MR; Surprenant AM
Exp Psychol; 2016 Nov; 63(6):351-360. PubMed ID: 28059028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Part-list cuing of associative chains: tests of strategy disruption.
Serra M; Oswald KM
J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jul; 133(3):301-17. PubMed ID: 16937897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Memory discrimination for self-performed and imagined acts: bizarreness effects in false recognition.
Worthen JB; Wood VV
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 11216321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Further evidence of the intricacy of memory span.
Brooks JO; Watkins MJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1134-41. PubMed ID: 2148584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. List composition and the word length effect in immediate recall: a comparison of localist and globalist assumptions.
Cowan N; Baddeley AD; Elliott EM; Norris J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 12747492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grouping in primary memory: the case of the compound suffix.
LeCompte DC; Watkins MJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Jan; 21(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 7876775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Context retrieval and context change in free recall: recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation.
Jang Y; Huber DE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):112-27. PubMed ID: 18194058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Secondary distinctiveness effects: Orthographic distinctiveness and bizarreness effects make independent contributions to memory performance.
Gounden Y; Cerroti F; Nicolas S
Scand J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 58(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 27859302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modality effects in sentence recall.
Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Eaton M
J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 19350835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
