149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9690155)
1. [The Association for Computerized Medical Records Users in Perinatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology sentinel network for maternity hospitals. II. Changes in practices and results. 1994-1997].
Mamelle N; Munoz F; Lehingue Y; Pasquier JC; Béranger C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Jun; 27(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 9690155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Prenatal health in 2002-2003. Survey of medical practice. Results from the Audipog sentinel network].
Mamelle N; Vendittelli F; Rivière O; Crenn-Hébert C; Lémery D; Marès P; Rozan MA; Maria B;
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Aug; 32 Spec No 1():4-22. PubMed ID: 15597666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Perinatal health indicators in 2001 and its evolution since 1994. Results from the Audipog sentinel network].
Mamelle N; David S; Vendittelli F; Pinquier D; Claris O; Maria B; Marès P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2002 Dec; 30 Suppl 1():6-39. PubMed ID: 12661112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The Association of Computerized Medical Records Users in Perinatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Sentinel Network for maternity hospitals. I. Perinatal health indicators in 1994].
Mamelle N; Lehingue Y; Munoz F; Miginiac M; Béranger C; Tounissoux D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 8964953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation in gynecology and obstetrics. Propositions for routine evaluation of professional practices].
Poisson-Salomon AS; Crenn-Hébert C; Blot P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994; 23(8):858-64. PubMed ID: 7706653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Audipog perinatal network 2004-2005. Part 2: assessment of medical practices].
Vendittelli F; Rivière O; Crenn-Hébert C; Claris O; Tessier V; Pinquier D; Teurnier F; Lansac J; Maria B;
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Dec; 36(12):1202-10. PubMed ID: 19008145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Who delivers where? Who is born where? Analysis of the 1997-1998 AUDIPOG Sentinel Network].
David S; Mamelle N; Rivière O
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Dec; 29(8):772-783. PubMed ID: 11139714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Medical practice assessment: an introduction].
Vendittelli F; Tessier V; Crenn-Hébert C; Lejeune C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Apr; 37(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 18313235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Survey of the practice of cervical ripening and labor induction in France].
Goffinet F; Dreyfus M; Carbonne B; Magnin G; Cabrol D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Nov; 32(7):638-46. PubMed ID: 14699333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of care for chronic illness in primary care: opportunity for improvement in process and outcome measures.
Ornstein SM; Jenkins RG
Am J Manag Care; 1999 May; 5(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 10537868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model for improvement - Part Two: Measurement and feedback for quality improvement efforts.
Randolph G; Esporas M; Provost L; Massie S; Bundy DG
Pediatr Clin North Am; 2009 Aug; 56(4):779-98. PubMed ID: 19660627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Administrative data for quality improvement.
Schwartz RM; Gagnon DE; Muri JH; Zhao QR; Kellogg R
Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):291-301. PubMed ID: 9917472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center.
Blayney DW; McNiff K; Hanauer D; Miela G; Markstrom D; Neuss M
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 27(23):3802-7. PubMed ID: 19487377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing cesarean birth rates with data-driven quality improvement activities.
Main EK
Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):374-83. PubMed ID: 9917479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality improvement's new focus yields quantitative results.
Brewster AC
Physician Exec; 1993; 19(3):32-6. PubMed ID: 10129399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Data innovations spur physician involvement in the quality process at Memorial Medical Center of Jacksonville, Florida.
Azcuy A; Keating R
Strateg Healthc Excell; 1993 Jan; 6(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 10123357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Practice comparison offers clues for improvement of practice management: inspection obstetrics and gynecology as an example].
Lombarts MJ; Merkus JM; Hamersma AM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Apr; 139(13):686-90. PubMed ID: 7723872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Perinatal information system: a methodological proposal.
Krauss Silva L
Int J Qual Health Care; 1996 Jun; 8(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 8885192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Value of a consultation center and crisis intervention in addressing psychiatric disorders in the perinatal period].
Vaiva G; Maron M; Chapoy V; Thomas P; Codaccioni X; Goudemand M
Encephale; 2002; 28(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11963346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Ten years prenatal health surveillance by obstetrics professionals in the Audipog network system].
Mamelle N; Maria B
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Aug; 32 Spec No 1():1-3. PubMed ID: 15597665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
