135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9690255)
1. Film and digital radiography for detection of simulated root resorption cavities.
Borg E; Källqvist A; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jul; 86(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 9690255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of conventional film with different digital and digitally filtered images in the detection of simulated internal resorption cavities--an ex vivo study in human cadaver jaws.
Kamburoğlu K; Barenboim SF; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):790-7. PubMed ID: 17942339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: a comparison study.
Shokri A; Mortazavi H; Salemi F; Javadian A; Bakhtiari H; Matlabi H
Biomed J; 2013; 36(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 23515150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
Durack C; Patel S; Davies J; Wilson R; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2011 Feb; 44(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 21083575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Observer ability to detect ex vivo simulated internal or external cervical root resorption.
Kamburoğlu K; Kurşun S; Yüksel S; Oztaş B
J Endod; 2011 Feb; 37(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 21238797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conventional and digital radiographic methods in the detection of simulated external root resorptions: a comparative study.
Westphalen VP; Gomes de Moraes I; Westphalen FH; Martins WD; Souza PH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 15533976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems.
Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 9446978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of phosphor plate systems and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated internal root resorption.
Vasconcelos KF; Rovaris K; Nascimento EHL; Oliveira ML; Távora DM; Bóscolo FN
Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Nov; 75(8):573-576. PubMed ID: 28754080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Root Perforation within Simulated Internal Resorption Cavities Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Khojastepour L; Moazami F; Babaei M; Forghani M
J Endod; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1520-3. PubMed ID: 26025347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Souza PC; Willems G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):764.e1-11; discussion 764-5. PubMed ID: 19962592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnosis of artificially induced external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, and PSP: an ex vivo study.
Kamburoğlu K; Tsesis I; Kfir A; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):885-91. PubMed ID: 18547837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of simulated internal resorption cavities using digital and digital subtraction radiography: a comparative study.
Stephanopoulos G; Mikrogeorgis G; Lyroudia K
Dent Traumatol; 2011 Oct; 27(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 21762378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Storage-phosphor computed radiography versus film radiography in the detection of pathologic periradicular bone loss in cadavers.
Holtzmann DJ; Johnson WT; Southard TE; Khademi JA; Chang PJ; Rivera EM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jul; 86(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 9690252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography.
Heo MS; Lee SS; Lee KH; Choi HM; Choi SC; Park TW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 11250638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of experimentally induced root fractures on digital and conventional radiographs: an in vitro study.
Kondylidou-Sidira A; Fardi A; Giannopoulou M; Parisis N
Odontology; 2013 Jan; 101(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 22249846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic ability of computed tomography to evaluate external root resorption in vitro.
da Silveira HL; Silveira HE; Liedke GS; Lermen CA; Dos Santos RB; de Figueiredo JA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Oct; 36(7):393-6. PubMed ID: 17881597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The detection and management of root resorption lesions using intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography - an in vivo investigation.
Patel S; Dawood A; Wilson R; Horner K; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2009 Sep; 42(9):831-8. PubMed ID: 19627378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of brightness and contrast variation for detectability of root resorption lesions in digital intraoral radiographs.
Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Galvão NS; Moreira-Souza L; Oliveira-Santos C; Freitas DQ
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3379-3386. PubMed ID: 30535816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
