These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9691062)

  • 1. Effective size and polymorphism of linked neutral loci in populations under directional selection.
    Santiago E; Caballero A
    Genetics; 1998 Aug; 149(4):2105-17. PubMed ID: 9691062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.
    Connallon T; Clark AG
    Genetics; 2012 Apr; 190(4):1477-89. PubMed ID: 22298707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective size of populations under partial inbreeding and selection on a set of linked additive genes.
    Nomura T
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):563-84. PubMed ID: 16161812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of deleterious mutations on linked, neutral variation in small populations.
    Pálsson S; Pamilo P
    Genetics; 1999 Sep; 153(1):475-83. PubMed ID: 10471727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint Prediction of the Effective Population Size and the Rate of Fixation of Deleterious Mutations.
    Santiago E; Caballero A
    Genetics; 2016 Nov; 204(3):1267-1279. PubMed ID: 27672094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection response in finite populations.
    Wei M; Caballero A; Hill WG
    Genetics; 1996 Dec; 144(4):1961-74. PubMed ID: 8978079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From Drift to Draft: How Much Do Beneficial Mutations Actually Contribute to Predictions of Ohta's Slightly Deleterious Model of Molecular Evolution?
    Chen J; Glémin S; Lascoux M
    Genetics; 2020 Apr; 214(4):1005-1018. PubMed ID: 32015019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A reanalysis of protein polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana: effects of population size and selection.
    Morton RA; Choudhary M; Cariou ML; Singh RS
    Genetica; 2004 Mar; 120(1-3):101-14. PubMed ID: 15088651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resolving the Conflict Between Associative Overdominance and Background Selection.
    Zhao L; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2016 Jul; 203(3):1315-34. PubMed ID: 27182952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of linkage and population size on inbreeding depression due to mutational load.
    Charlesworth D; Morgan MT; Charlesworth B
    Genet Res; 1992 Feb; 59(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 1572536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The variance of sample heterozygosity.
    Weir BS; Reynolds J; Dodds KG
    Theor Popul Biol; 1990 Feb; 37(1):235-53. PubMed ID: 2326765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection.
    Comeron JM; Kreitman M
    Genetics; 2002 May; 161(1):389-410. PubMed ID: 12019253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The hitchhiking effect of a strongly selected substitution in male germline on neutral polymorphism in a monogamy population.
    Li J; Schneider KA; Li H
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71497. PubMed ID: 24015187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations.
    Charlesworth B; Nordborg M; Charlesworth D
    Genet Res; 1997 Oct; 70(2):155-74. PubMed ID: 9449192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Wright-Fisher graph model and the impact of directional selection on genetic variation.
    Kaj I; Mugal CF; Müller-Widmann R
    Theor Popul Biol; 2024 Oct; 159():13-24. PubMed ID: 39019334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coalescent size versus coalescent time with strong selection.
    Campbell RB
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 Oct; 69(7):2249-59. PubMed ID: 17546476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation.
    Kim Y; Stephan W
    Genetics; 2000 Jul; 155(3):1415-27. PubMed ID: 10880499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The advantage of recombination when selection is acting at many genetic Loci.
    Hickey DA; Golding GB
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Apr; 442():123-128. PubMed ID: 29355539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linkage and the limits to natural selection.
    Barton NH
    Genetics; 1995 Jun; 140(2):821-41. PubMed ID: 7498757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hitchhiking both ways: effect of two interfering selective sweeps on linked neutral variation.
    Chevin LM; Billiard S; Hospital F
    Genetics; 2008 Sep; 180(1):301-16. PubMed ID: 18716333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.