These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9691892)

  • 1. Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between fast spin echo proton density and spin echo T1 axial scans.
    Peh WC; Siu TH; Chan JH; Chan FL
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):487-91. PubMed ID: 9691892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of T1-weighted fast spin-echo and T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images of the lumbar spine at 3.0 Tesla.
    Lavdas E; Vlychou M; Arikidis N; Kapsalaki E; Roka V; Fezoulidis IV
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 20170294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine: a prospective comparison of fast T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted turbo spin echo MR imaging.
    Erdem LO; Erdem CZ; Acikgoz B; Gundogdu S
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 16036160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast on T2-weighted images of the lumbar spine using fast spin-echo and gated conventional spin-echo sequences.
    Chappell PM; Glover GH; Enzmann DR
    Neuroradiology; 1995 Apr; 37(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 7603591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequences and techniques in spinal MR imaging.
    Demaerel P; Sunaert S; Wilms G
    JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(4):221-2. PubMed ID: 14527063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fat-suppressed T2* sequences for routine 3.0-tesla lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary report.
    McKinney AM; Gadani S; Palmer CS; Vidarsson L
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Sep; 49(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 18608016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens].
    Liao H; Yu W; Wang W; Liao Y
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences.
    Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC
    Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meniscal tear evaluation. Comparison of a conventional spin-echo proton density sequence with a fast spin-echo sequence utilizing a 512 × 358 matrix size.
    Hopper MA; Robinson P; Grainger AJ
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Apr; 66(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 21356395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition MRI and its diagnostic value for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
    Nemoto O; Fujikawa A; Tachibana A
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Jul; 24 Suppl 1():S209-14. PubMed ID: 24292491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted FLAIR and fast spin-echo MRI of the spine at 3 T for evaluation of extradural lesions.
    Shah KB; Guha-Thakurta N; Schellingerhout D; Madewell JE; Kumar AJ; Costelloe CM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 21862814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
    Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Magnetic resonance myelography with a fast-spin-echo sequence].
    Scarabino T; Giannatempo GM; Perfetto F; Popolizio T; Salvolini U
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 8628931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gradient-echo MR imaging of the cervical spine: evaluation of extradural disease.
    VanDyke C; Ross JS; Tkach J; Masaryk TJ; Modic MT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Aug; 153(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 2750626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of sagittal fat-suppressed proton-density fast-spin-echo of the knee joint as a limited protocol in evaluating internal knee derangements.
    Khoury NJ; Mahfoud Z; Masrouha KZ; Elkattah R; Assaad T; Abdallah A; Hourani MH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):653-61. PubMed ID: 21926865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast SE MRI of the chest: parameter optimization and comparison with conventional SE imaging.
    Olson EM; Bergin CJ; King MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 7890836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gradient-echo MR imaging of the lumbar spine: comparison with spin-echo technique.
    Watanabe AT; Teitelbaum GP; Lufkin RB; Tsuruda JS; Jinkins JR; Bradley WG
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 2335609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast spin-echo imaging of the brain.
    Jolesz FA; Jones KM
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 5(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8416684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast spin echo vs conventional spin echo in cervical spine imaging.
    Gillams AR; Soto JA; Carter AP
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(8):1211-4. PubMed ID: 9377502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T.
    Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.