86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9692031)
1. Variability in glaucomatous visual fields: implications for shared care schemes.
Henson DB; Spry PG; Spencer IC; Sparrow JM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Mar; 18(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 9692031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting progressive visual field loss.
Henson DB; Darling MN
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Sep; 15(5):387-90. PubMed ID: 8524561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma patients with asymmetric hemifield visual field loss.
Badlani V; Shahidi M; Shakoor A; Edward DP; Zelkha R; Wilensky J
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 16865002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data.
Spry PG; Bates AB; Johnson CA; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2192-200. PubMed ID: 10892862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative comparison of static perimetric strategies in early glaucoma: test-retest variability.
Spry PG; Henson DB; Sparrow JM; North RV
J Glaucoma; 2000 Jun; 9(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 10877376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability?
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2201-4. PubMed ID: 10892863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Glaucoma patients treated by practicing ophthalmologists in Denmark. Estimated number of patients and the extent of visual field defects].
Lundberg LU; Thygesen J; Damgaard-Jensen L; Serup L; Kessing SV
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(21):3028-33. PubMed ID: 10850191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.
Henson DB; Chaudry S; Artes PH; Faragher EB; Ansons A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Feb; 41(2):417-21. PubMed ID: 10670471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of an automated confrontation testing device versus finger counting in the detection of field loss.
Bass SJ; Cooper J; Feldman J; Horn D
Optometry; 2007 Aug; 78(8):390-5. PubMed ID: 17662927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term survival of central visual field in end-stage glaucoma.
Much JW; Liu C; Piltz-Seymour JR
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1162-6. PubMed ID: 18067965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study of 2 classifications of glaucomatous perimetric deficits].
Risse JF; Dumause A; Hue B
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1999; 22(7):738-42. PubMed ID: 10510751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perimetric sensitivity and response variability in glaucoma with single-stimulus automated perimetry and multiple-stimulus perimetry with verbal feedback.
Miranda MA; Henson DB
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 18005269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
