These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9693485)

  • 1. Compulsory Caesarean sections: an English perspective.
    Francis R
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 9693485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mental incapacity and consent to treatment. Who gives the go-ahead?
    Allison G
    Health Serv J; 1997 May; 107(5554):suppl 11-2. PubMed ID: 10168214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judge allows a caesarean section to go ahead on a patient without her consent.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():g1275. PubMed ID: 24480397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex law reform in an international perspective: England and Wales and Canada.
    Greenland C
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(4):309-30. PubMed ID: 6661561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making.
    Stanyer BT
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Thiel A, Röttgers H.R. Compulsory treatment under guardianship legislation. Psychiat Prax 2006; 33: 196-201].
    Dreyer J
    Psychiatr Prax; 2006 Sep; 33(6):305-6. PubMed ID: 16944443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court-ordered cesarean sections receive judicial defeat.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Aug; 323(7):489-92. PubMed ID: 2082954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mental Health Act.
    Eaton L
    Ment Health Today; 2008 Nov; ():5. PubMed ID: 19058366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rhetoric and reality: the limitations of patient self-determination in contemporary English law.
    Munby J
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):315-34. PubMed ID: 9693483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The rights of pregnant patients: Carder case brings bold policy initiatives.
    Thornton TE; Paltrow L
    Healthspan; 1991 May; 8(5):10-6. PubMed ID: 10111987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Tracking nursing home patients with dementia with a microchip: need for consent debated].
    Weber M
    Pflege Z; 2008 May; 61(5):283-5. PubMed ID: 18552118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The delivery dilemma: a question of competency.
    Cushing M
    Am J Nurs; 1993 Apr; 93(4):20-2. PubMed ID: 8480798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court to examine legality of compulsory caesarean sections.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Jan; 314(7073):8. PubMed ID: 9001467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. But she's not an "inanimate container...".
    Mishkin B
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(3):40-2. PubMed ID: 3397279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal versus maternal rights: who is the patient?
    Goldman EB
    Mich Hosp; 1983 Apr; 19(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 10259175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inclusionary standard for determining sexual consent for individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Ames TR; Samowitz P
    Ment Retard; 1995 Aug; 33(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 7565150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent and the betrayal of patient's rights.
    Johnstone MJ
    Aust Nurs J; 2000 Aug; 8(2):40-1. PubMed ID: 11894457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consent. Tips for health care professionals.
    Gulam H
    Aust Nurs J; 2004 Aug; 12(2):17, 19. PubMed ID: 19157401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. United we stand.
    Bell A
    Ment Health Today; 2008 Nov; ():12-3. PubMed ID: 19058369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enforced caesarean section: a US appeal.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1990 May; 335(8700):1270. PubMed ID: 1971334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.