These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9693486)
21. The CCAR responsum on end of life issues: an American legal perspective. Saperstein D; Mishkin D CCAR J; 1997; 44(2):36-45. PubMed ID: 15712421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. State legislative roundup--1990. Schnediman D Bull Am Coll Surg; 1991 Jan; 76(1):68-9, 89. PubMed ID: 10108953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Justifying assisted suicide: comments on the ongoing debate. Urofsky MI Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2000; 14(2):893-943. PubMed ID: 12705271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Looking beyond the law to improve end-of-life care. Zuckerman C Generations; 1999; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17144036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Changing attitudes in Florida's 'right to die' law. Grimes GK Stetson Law Rev; 1985; 14(2):375-95. PubMed ID: 16100801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Living wills. Reppun JI Hawaii Med J; 1990 Dec; 49(12):447. PubMed ID: 2286517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Responsible public policy at the end of life. Chopko ME Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1998; 75(3):557-94. PubMed ID: 12627572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law. Goldmeier KE MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Physician-assisted suicide and the right to die with assistance. Harv Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 105(8):2021-40. PubMed ID: 10119163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client. Harner SR Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The right to die: Kansas law and physicians. Stratton WT Kans Med; 1992 Jan; 93(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 1545537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Ethical and legal issues in the individual's right to die. Risley RL Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(3):597-646. PubMed ID: 12199243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Constitution at the threshold of life and death: a suggested approach to accommodate an interest in life and a right to die. Allen MP Am Univ Law Rev; 2004 Jun; 53(5):971-1020. PubMed ID: 15529470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Right to die. New law and policy issues appear while old ones remain unresolved. Fade A Healthspan; 1994 Feb; 11(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 10132990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. "She don't want no life support." A summary of Osgood and other developments in Michigan since Martin. Broder AJ Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1998; 75(3):595-605. PubMed ID: 12627574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Accepting the consequences of a treatment-refusal decision. Moore DL Bioeth Bull; 1995; 4(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 11822418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York. Caffera SM Syracuse Law Rev; 1991; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A new form of medical malpractice?: Missouri's "living will" statute. Murphy RE J Mo Bar; 1986; 42(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 11649874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]