These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9693526)

  • 1. Observer-independent registration of perspective projection prior to subtraction of in vivo radiographs.
    Lehmann TM; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Schmitt W; Spitzer K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):140-50. PubMed ID: 9693526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic noise robust registration of radiographs for subtraction using strategic local correlation: an application to radiographs of dental implants.
    Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Lee SB; Huh KH
    Comput Biol Med; 2005 Mar; 35(3):247-58. PubMed ID: 15582631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A digital subtraction radiography scheme based on automatic multiresolution registration.
    Zacharaki EI; Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Nikita KS; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Nov; 33(6):379-90. PubMed ID: 15665232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone changes from color-coded with subtraction radiographs.
    Shi XQ; Eklund I; Tronje G; Welander U; Stamatakis HC; Engström PE; Engström GN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10202476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtual radiographs computed from TACT volume data as a gold standard for image registration prior to subtraction.
    Lehmann TM; Hemler PF; Webber RL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 12058267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic correspondence using the enhanced hexagonal centre-based inner search algorithm for point-based dental image registration.
    Economopoulos T; Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):185-204. PubMed ID: 18460572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided dental identification: an objective method for assessment of radiographic image similarity.
    Flint DJ; Brent Dove S; Brumit PC; White M; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 19040666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An iterative point correspondence algorithm for automatic image registration: an application to dental subtraction radiography.
    Markaki VE; Asvestas PA; Matsopoulos GK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jan; 93(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18760858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of low-dose digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Näslund EB; Kruger M; Petersson A; Hansen K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 9693525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of automatic exposure control in a direct digital intraoral system.
    Benchimol D; Näsström K; Shi X
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):407-12. PubMed ID: 19700535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ROI-based image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Huh KH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):523-9. PubMed ID: 16545718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method for the automated alignment of dental radiographs for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yoon DC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10654031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and evaluation of digital subtraction radiography computer program.
    Lee SS; Huh YJ; Kim KY; Heo MS; Choi SC; Koak JY; Heo SJ; Han CH; Yi WJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Oct; 98(4):471-5. PubMed ID: 15472663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology.
    Lehmann TM; Gröndahl HG; Benn DK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Nov; 29(6):323-46. PubMed ID: 11114663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of two registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography.
    Dunn SM; van der Stelt PF; Ponce A; Fenesy K; Shah S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 May; 22(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 8375559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Registration of dental radiographs using projective geometry.
    Ostuni J; Fisher E; van der Stelt P; Dunn S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 8181647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The performance of projective standardization for digital subtraction radiography.
    Mol A; Dunn SM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Sep; 96(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 12973297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Chang HF; Chen KC
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11036999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Analysis of registration parameter of the dental radiographs for digital subtraction].
    Zhang G; Ma X; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Sep; 32(5):265-8. PubMed ID: 11189282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.