These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9693527)

  • 1. Advantage of appropriate K-edge filters for one-shot dual-energy subtraction sialography.
    Kobayashi S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):151-62. PubMed ID: 9693527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
    Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of a flat-panel based real time dual-energy system for cardiac imaging.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1562-8. PubMed ID: 16872063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-shot dual-energy subtraction mammography with electronic spectrum splitting: feasibility.
    Bornefalk H; Lewin JM; Danielsson M; Lundqvist M
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 60(2):275-8. PubMed ID: 17049196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
    Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents.
    Diekmann F; Sommer A; Lawaczeck R; Diekmann S; Pietsch H; Speck U; Hamm B; Bick U
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 17414528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of iodine removal using dual-energy CT with or without a tin filter: an experimental phantom study.
    Kawai T; Takeuchi M; Hara M; Ohashi K; Suzuki H; Yamada K; Sugimura Y; Shibamoto Y
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):954-60. PubMed ID: 23612431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative analysis of the effect of energy separation in k-edge digital subtraction imaging.
    Sarnelli A; Taibi A; Baldelli P; Gambaccini M; Bravin A
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3015-26. PubMed ID: 17505086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography.
    Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photon counting spectral CT: improved material decomposition with K-edge-filtered x-rays.
    Shikhaliev PM
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(6):1595-615. PubMed ID: 22398007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gadolinium as a contrast agent for infusion sialograms in patients with iodine allergy.
    Sabotin RP; Thorpe R; Maley JE; Policeni B; Hoffman HT
    Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2023 Oct; 8(5):1178-1183. PubMed ID: 37899876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quantitative image of bone mineral content--dual energy subtraction in a single exposure].
    Katoh T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1127-38. PubMed ID: 2247354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual energy subtraction: principles and clinical applications.
    Vock P; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 19423259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tin-filter enhanced dual-energy-CT: image quality and accuracy of CT numbers in virtual noncontrast imaging.
    Kaufmann S; Sauter A; Spira D; Gatidis S; Ketelsen D; Heuschmid M; Claussen CD; Thomas C
    Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 23490736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gadolinium an alternative contrast agent for sialography in patients with iodine sensitivity.
    Williams MD; Moody AB; Newlands CA; Howlett DC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Dec; 32(6):651-2. PubMed ID: 14636619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Virtual single-source computed tomography using dual-source acquisition: a new technique for the dose-neutral intraindividual comparison of different scan protocols.
    Werncke T; Meyer BC; Wacker FK; von Falck C
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):742-8. PubMed ID: 24918463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of three different techniques for dual-energy subtraction imaging in digital radiography: a signal-to-noise analysis.
    Shaw CC; Gur D
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 Nov; 5(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 1457542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of rare-earth filters on patient exposure and image contrast.
    Mauriello SM; Washburn DB; Matteson SR
    J Dent Res; 1987 Aug; 66(8):1326-30. PubMed ID: 3476600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media.
    Grant KL; Flohr TG; Krauss B; Sedlmair M; Thomas C; Schmidt B
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 24710203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Material characterization of dual-energy computed tomographic data using polar coordinates.
    Havla L; Peller M; Cyran C; Nikolaou K; Reiser M; Dietrich O
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 25279847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.