These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9693530)

  • 21. Analysis of the reproducibility of the gray values and noise of a direct digital radiography system.
    Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Teixeira RC; Capelozza AL; Rubira-Bullen IR
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26017488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comments on noise and resolution of the DenOptix radiography system.
    Couture RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 12789159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Flat-panel digital radiology with amorphous selenium and active-matrix readout.
    Rowlands JA; Zhao W; Blevis IM; Waechter DF; Huang Z
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(3):753-60. PubMed ID: 9153709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Initial evaluation of linear and spatially oriented planar images from a new dental panoramic system based on tomosynthesis.
    Katsumata A; Ogawa K; Inukai K; Matsuoka M; Nagano T; Nagaoka H; Yamakawa T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Sep; 112(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 21827959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison.
    Piraino DW; Davros WJ; Lieber M; Richmond BJ; Schils JP; Recht MP; Grooff PN; Belhobek GH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 9888764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resolution properties of a 2048 x 2048 matrix image intensifier-TV based digital radiography system.
    Ogura T; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 1994 Mar; 21(3):463-9. PubMed ID: 8208222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
    Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
    Floyd CE; Warp RJ; Dobbins JT; Chotas HG; Baydush AH; Vargas-Voracek R; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 11230640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital radiography: update for oral health care workers.
    Noffke CE; Nzima N; Chabikuli NJ
    SADJ; 2004 Aug; 59(7):293-5. PubMed ID: 15537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Seamless tiling of amorphous silicon photodiode-TFT arrays for very large area X-ray image sensors.
    Powell MJ; Hughes JR; Bird NC; Glasse C; King TR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Dec; 17(6):1080-3. PubMed ID: 10048865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Firriolo FJ; Yancey JM; Stewart AV
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9482021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.