These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Kiremitçi A; Bolay S; Gürgan S Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations. Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results. Baratieri LN; Canabarro S; Lopes GC; Ritter AV Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 14531591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure. Malament KA; Socransky SS J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin. Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scanning electron microscopic description of cellular activity and mineral changes in feline odontoclastic resorptive lesions. Gauthier O; Boudigues S; Pilet P; Aguado E; Heymann D; Daculsi G J Vet Dent; 2001 Dec; 18(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 11968898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finds fault in dental imaging article. Carmichael D J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2004 Mar; 224(5):661; author reply 661. PubMed ID: 15008121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients. McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro. Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic evaluation and treatment of feline dental resorptive lesions. DuPont GA Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2005 Jul; 35(4):943-62, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 15979520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of severe pre-eruptive intracoronal resorption of a permanent second molar. Davidovich E; Kreiner B; Peretz B Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 15839399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice. Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations. Wiegand A; Attin T Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 17320944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite in non-carious Class V lesions: two-year results. Turner EW; Shook LW; Ross JA; deRijk W; Eason BC J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2008; 88(2):20-4; quiz 24-5. PubMed ID: 18593093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]