These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9693853)

  • 1. Systematic reviews and making decisions.
    Logan S
    Child Care Health Dev; 1998 Jul; 24(4):255-7. PubMed ID: 9693853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commentary: searching for trials for systematic reviews: what difference does it make?
    Clarke M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 31(1):123-4. PubMed ID: 11914307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic reviews: insufficient evidence on which to base medicine.
    Gardosi J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Jan; 105(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9442151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Handoll HH; Gillespie LD; Gillespie WJ; Howe TE; Madhok R; Parker MJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 May; (422):272; author reply 273-4. PubMed ID: 15187871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic reviews of meta-analyses: applications and limitations.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Feb; 60(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 16415253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based periodontology, systematic reviews and research quality.
    Needleman I; Moles DR; Worthington H
    Periodontol 2000; 2005; 37():12-28. PubMed ID: 15655022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Therapeutic decisions based on meta analyses].
    Komossa K; Kissling W; Leucht S; Möller HJ
    Psychiatr Prax; 2008 Nov; 35(8):373-5. PubMed ID: 19016212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical methods can be improved within Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews.
    Riley RD; Gates S; Neilson J; Alfirevic Z
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 64(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 21109399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochrane reviews in pregnancy: the role of perinatal randomized trials and systematic reviews in establishing evidence.
    Dodd JM; Crowther CA
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Apr; 11(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16413839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Systematic reviews, an update].
    Scholten RJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 May; 153(18):866-9. PubMed ID: 19475866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias].
    Nolting A; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(9):670-6. PubMed ID: 23200211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GRADE: complex decisions.
    Shepperd S; Straus S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1270-1. PubMed ID: 21962522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.
    Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.
    Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Montori V; Vist G; Kunz R; Brozek J; Alonso-Coello P; Djulbegovic B; Atkins D; Falck-Ytter Y; Williams JW; Meerpohl J; Norris SL; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1277-82. PubMed ID: 21802904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Workshop 11-sources of bias in studies of systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis.
    Yu IT; Tse SL
    Hong Kong Med J; 2013 Apr; 19(2):156-8. PubMed ID: 23535676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What has the Cochrane collaboration ever done for newborn infants?
    McGuire W; Fowlie PW; Soll RF
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2010 Jan; 95(1):F2-6. PubMed ID: 19414431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based medicine.
    Smyth RL
    Paediatr Respir Rev; 2000 Sep; 1(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 12531092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.