These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9695641)

  • 41. Comparison of broadband ultrasonic attenuation of the os calcis and quantitative computed tomography of the distal radius.
    Hosie CJ; Smith DA; Deacon AD; Langton CM
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1987 Nov; 8(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 3322636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
    Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Bone ultrasound in healthy women and bone mass related factors].
    Rodríguez García A; Díaz-Miguel Pérez C; Vázquez Díaz M; Martín Peña M; Beltrán Gutiérrez J
    Med Clin (Barc); 1999 Sep; 113(8):285-9. PubMed ID: 10603580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Prediction of the biomechanical properties of cancellous bone using ultrasound velocity and bone mineral density--an in vitro study.
    Drozdzowska B; Pluskiewicz W; Przedlacki J
    Med Sci Monit; 2002 Jan; 8(1):MT15-20. PubMed ID: 11782683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Ultrasonic assessment of human and bovine trabecular bone: a comparison study.
    Alves JM; Xu W; Lin D; Siffert RS; Ryaby JT; Kaufman JJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Mar; 43(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 8682537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Differential effects of primary hyperparathyroidism on ultrasound properties of bone.
    Ingle BM; Thomas WE; Eastell R
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 Jul; 13(7):572-8. PubMed ID: 12111018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Optimal prediction of bone mineral density with ultrasonic measurements in excised human femur.
    Haïat G; Padilla F; Barkmann R; Dencks S; Moser U; Glüer CC; Laugier P
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Sep; 77(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 16151672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Relationships of trabecular bone structure with quantitative ultrasound parameters: in vitro study on human proximal femur using transmission and backscatter measurements.
    Padilla F; Jenson F; Bousson V; Peyrin F; Laugier P
    Bone; 2008 Jun; 42(6):1193-202. PubMed ID: 18396124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Do markers of bone resorption add to bone mineral density and ultrasonographic heel measurement for the prediction of hip fracture in elderly women? The EPIDOS prospective study.
    Garnero P; Dargent-Molina P; Hans D; Schott AM; Bréart G; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD
    Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 10326062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Linear poroelastic cancellous bone anisotropy: trabecular solid elastic and fluid transport properties.
    Kohles SS; Roberts JB
    J Biomech Eng; 2002 Oct; 124(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 12405594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Low-megahertz ultrasonic properties of bovine cancellous bone.
    Hoffmeister BK; Whitten SA; Rho JY
    Bone; 2000 Jun; 26(6):635-42. PubMed ID: 10831936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Ultrasonic wave propagation characteristics of cancellous bone].
    Otani T
    Clin Calcium; 2004 Dec; 14(12):69-75. PubMed ID: 15577177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantitative ultrasound or clinical risk factors--which best identifies women at risk of osteoporosis?
    Stewart A; Reid DM
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 73(866):165-71. PubMed ID: 10884730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of methylprednisolone on bone mineral density and microarchitecture of trabecular bones in rats with administration time and assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Liu SP; Liao EY; Chen J; Yang SM; Li JW; Sheng ZF; Mo H; Wu XP; Yao L; Dai RC
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jan; 50(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 19052933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Correlation between hydroxyapatite crystallite orientation and ultrasonic wave velocities in bovine cortical bone.
    Yamato Y; Matsukawa M; Yanagitani T; Yamazaki K; Mizukawa H; Nagano A
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2008 Feb; 82(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 18246292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination?
    Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 10912845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status.
    Langton CM; Langton DK
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):31-5. PubMed ID: 10721317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ultrasonic wave propagation in trabecular bone predicted by the stratified model.
    Lin W; Qin YX; Rubin C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 Sep; 29(9):781-90. PubMed ID: 11599586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Broadband ultrasound attenuation imaging: a new imaging method in osteoporosis.
    Roux C; Fournier B; Laugier P; Chappard C; Kolta S; Dougados M; Berger G
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Aug; 11(8):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8854247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of reflection and transmission ultrasonic techniques for measurement of cancellous bone elasticity.
    Ashman RB; Antich PP; Gonzales J; Anderson JA; Rho JY
    J Biomech; 1994 Sep; 27(9):1195-9. PubMed ID: 7929470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.