These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9696112)
1. Detecting socially desirable responding with the Personality Assessment Inventory: the Positive Impression Management scale and the Defensiveness Index. Peebles J; Moore RJ J Clin Psychol; 1998 Aug; 54(5):621-8. PubMed ID: 9696112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the balanced inventory of desirable responding. Stöber J; Dette DE; Musch J J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):370-89. PubMed ID: 12067199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Socially desirable responding in Chinese university students: denial and enhancement? Li F; Li Y; Wang Y Psychol Rep; 2015 Apr; 116(2):409-21. PubMed ID: 25730746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing the incremental utility of the negative impression-positive impression differential in detecting simulated personality assessment inventory profiles. Hopwood CJ; Talbert CA; Morey LC; Rogers R J Clin Psychol; 2008 Mar; 64(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 18302214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): a factor analysis. Li F; Li Y Psychol Rep; 2008 Dec; 103(3):727-31. PubMed ID: 19320206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A generalizability analysis of score consistency for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Vispoel WP; Tao S Psychol Assess; 2013 Mar; 25(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 22867009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deceptiveness on the PAI: a study of naïve faking with psychiatric inpatients. Baity MR; Siefert CJ; Chambers A; Blais MA J Pers Assess; 2007 Feb; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 17266410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Self-Deceptive Enhancement and Impression Management correlates of EPQ-R dimensions. Davies MF; French CC; Keogh E J Psychol; 1998 Jul; 132(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 9637022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons among the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory (HPSI), the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR). Holden RR; Starzyk KB; McLeod LD; Edwards MJ Assessment; 2000 Jun; 7(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 10868254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using G-Theory to Enhance Evidence of Reliability and Validity for Common Uses of the Paulhus Deception Scales. Vispoel WP; Morris CA; Kilinc M Assessment; 2018 Jan; 25(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 27076506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling the balanced inventory of desirable responding: evidence in favor of a revised model of socially desirable responding. Gignac GE J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 23862685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI): an appraisal of validity in an outpatient sample. Mogge NL; Steinberg JS; Fremouw W; Messer J Depress Anxiety; 2008; 25(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17187348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positive impression management and its influence on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: a comparison of analog and differential prevalence group designs. Bagby RM; Marshall MB Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 14593833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can Faking Be Measured With Dedicated Validity Scales? Within-Subject Trifactor Mixture Modeling Applied to BIDR Responses. Guenole N; Brown A; Lim V Assessment; 2023 Jul; 30(5):1523-1542. PubMed ID: 35786013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vividness of visual imagery and social desirable responding: correlations of the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire with the balanced inventory of desirable responding and the Marlowe-Crowne scale. Allbutt J; Ling J; Rowley M; Shafiullah M Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):791-9. PubMed ID: 21494918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The validity of a regression-based procedure for detecting concealed psychopathology in structured personality assessment. Kurtz JE; Henk CM; Bupp LL; Dresler CM Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 25642929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the Personality Inventory for Youth validity scales. Wrobel TA; Lachar D; Wrobel NH; Morgan ST; Gruber CP Assessment; 1999 Dec; 6(4):367-80. PubMed ID: 10539983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Socially desirable responding by bariatric surgery candidates during psychological assessment. Ambwani S; Boeka AG; Brown JD; Byrne TK; Budak AR; Sarwer DB; Fabricatore AN; Morey LC; O'Neil PM Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2013; 9(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 21924688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Social desirability in personality inventories: symptoms, diagnosis and prescribed cure. Bäckström M; Björklund F Scand J Psychol; 2013 Apr; 54(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 23252410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Taxometric analysis of impression management and self-deception in college student and personnel evaluation settings. Strong DR; Greene RL; Kordinak ST J Pers Assess; 2002 Feb; 78(1):161-75. PubMed ID: 11936207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]