These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Holographic interferometry and in vitro calcification: comparing pericardial versus porcine bioprostheses. Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Tjan DT; Reul H; von Bally G; Scheld HH J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 9697065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary tissue failure of bioprostheses: new evidence from in vitro tests. Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Pettenazzo E; Hammel D; Castellón W; Thiene G; Reul H; Berendes E; Scheld HH Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 49(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 11339456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality control of bioprosthetic heart valves by means of holographic interferometry. Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Zarubin AM; Reul H; Geiger A; von Bally G; Stargardt A; Rau G; Scheld HH J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jul; 5(4):441-7; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 8858512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic in vitro calcification of porcine aortic valves. Bernacca GM; Tobasnick G; Wheatley DJ J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 8000613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep]. Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves. Thubrikar MJ; Deck JD; Aouad J; Nolan SP J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Jul; 86(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 6865456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study. Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses. Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Failure of porcine aortic and bovine pericardial prosthetic valves: an experimental investigation in young sheep. Barnhart GR; Jones M; Ishihara T; Chavez AM; Rose DM; Ferrans VJ Circulation; 1982 Aug; 66(2 Pt 2):I150-3. PubMed ID: 7083535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of in vivo models for studying calcification behavior of commercially available bovine pericardium. Quintero LJ; Lohre JM; Hernandez N; Meyer SC; McCarthy TJ; Lin DS; Shen SH J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 9651837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Porcine aortic versus bovine pericardial valves: a comparative study of unimplanted and from patient explanted bioprostheses. Goffin YA; Bartik MA Life Support Syst; 1987; 5(2):127-43. PubMed ID: 3669720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprostheses. Histologic and ultrastructural studies. Hilbert SL; Ferrans VJ; McAllister HA; Cooley DA Am J Pathol; 1992 May; 140(5):1195-204. PubMed ID: 1580331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Kangaroo versus freestyle stentless bioprostheses in a juvenile sheep model: hemodynamic performance and calcification behavior. Neethling WM; Hodge AJ; Glancy R J Card Surg; 2005; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15673407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties. Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glutaraldehyde detoxification in addition to enhanced amine cross-linking dramatically reduces bioprosthetic tissue calcification in the rat model. Weissenstein C; Human P; Bezuidenhout D; Zilla P J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 10772041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The behavior of pericardial versus porcine valve xenografts in the growing sheep model. Gallo I; Nistal F; Artiñano E; Fernández D; Cayón R; Carrión M; García-Martínez V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 3807402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing calcification of cardiac bioprostheses in adolescent sheep. Flameng W; Meuris B; Yperman J; De Visscher G; Herijgers P; Verbeken E J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Jul; 132(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 16798307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opening and closing kinematics of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses: an in vitro study. Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 134(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 17723814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]