These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function. Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Computer drug design based on analysis of a target macromolecule structure. I. Search and description of a ligand binding site in a target molecule]. Ivanov AS; Dubanov AV; Skvortsov VS; Archakov AI Vopr Med Khim; 2002; 48(3):304-15. PubMed ID: 12243090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of pockets on protein surfaces using small and large probe spheres to find putative ligand binding sites. Kawabata T; Go N Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):516-29. PubMed ID: 17444522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PUZZLE: a new method for automated protein docking based on surface shape complementarity. Helmer-Citterich M; Tramontano A J Mol Biol; 1994 Jan; 235(3):1021-31. PubMed ID: 7507171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Examination of shape complementarity in docking of unbound proteins. Norel R; Petrey D; Wolfson HJ; Nussinov R Proteins; 1999 Aug; 36(3):307-17. PubMed ID: 10409824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated generation of MCSS-derived pharmacophoric DOCK site points for searching multiconformation databases. Joseph-McCarthy D; Alvarez JC Proteins; 2003 May; 51(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 12660988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pocket extraction on proteins via the Voronoi diagram of spheres. Kim D; Cho CH; Cho Y; Ryu J; Bhak J; Kim DS J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Apr; 26(7):1104-12. PubMed ID: 18023220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Geometric and chemical patterns of interaction in protein--ligand complexes and their application in docking. Moreno E; León K Proteins; 2002 Apr; 47(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11870860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. Huang SY; Zou X Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BetaDock: shape-priority docking method based on beta-complex. Kim DS; Kim CM; Won CI; Kim JK; Ryu J; Cho Y; Lee C; Bhak J J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Aug; 29(1):219-42. PubMed ID: 21696235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HOOK: a program for finding novel molecular architectures that satisfy the chemical and steric requirements of a macromolecule binding site. Eisen MB; Wiley DC; Karplus M; Hubbard RE Proteins; 1994 Jul; 19(3):199-221. PubMed ID: 7937734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PSI-DOCK: towards highly efficient and accurate flexible ligand docking. Pei J; Wang Q; Liu Z; Li Q; Yang K; Lai L Proteins; 2006 Mar; 62(4):934-46. PubMed ID: 16395666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria. Peters KP; Fauck J; Frömmel C J Mol Biol; 1996 Feb; 256(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 8609611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An example of a protein ligand found by database mining: description of the docking method and its verification by a 2.3 A X-ray structure of a thrombin-ligand complex. Burkhard P; Taylor P; Walkinshaw MD J Mol Biol; 1998 Mar; 277(2):449-66. PubMed ID: 9514757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Docking ligands onto binding site representations derived from proteins built by homology modelling. Schafferhans A; Klebe G J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(1):407-27. PubMed ID: 11243828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]