134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9697390)
21. The effects of medical society control of Blue Shield on fees in the physician service market: some preliminary evidence.
Arnould RJ; Eisenstadt D
Q Rev Econ Bus; 1982; 22(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 10254992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Highmark, Independence join merger frenzy. Pa. Blues deal OK could take two years; insurer would control half of state's market.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(14):10. PubMed ID: 17444262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Forget everything you thought you knew about the Blues.
Tokarski C
Med Econ; 1996 Mar; 73(6):107-8, 111-2, 114 passim. PubMed ID: 10155925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. What is happening in the struggle to obtain a sensible reimbursement system for nurse-midwives in Pennsylvania?
Health Law Proj Libr Bull; 1979; 4(11-12):340-2. PubMed ID: 10245890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Challenging Highmark. Physicians in Pa. who opposed Blues merger are likely to get new hearing.
Hensley S
Mod Healthc; 1997 Oct; 27(40):33. PubMed ID: 10173628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Blues plans trying to extract better deals from hospitals.
Kenkel PJ
Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(33):32. PubMed ID: 10119810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Smooth sailing for Empire IPO. Surplus, reserve levels of Pa. Blues still red-hot issue.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2002 Sep; 32(36):14-5. PubMed ID: 12298321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Changing the face of medical policy.
Scalettar R; Hanley S
Healthplan; 2003; 44(6):50, 53-6. PubMed ID: 14674171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Blues primed to pay. 29 plans are already paying for performance.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2005 Jun; 35(26):16. PubMed ID: 16001491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Blue plans stop paying for 28 medical procedures and tests.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Sep; 32(3):24. PubMed ID: 10304842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Pa.: keep 'em separated. Blues merger rejection could have wider implications.
Vesely R
Mod Healthc; 2009 Jan; 39(4):10. PubMed ID: 19213127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Court upholds Blues' fee discounts.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1989 Sep; 19(35):3. PubMed ID: 10324683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Feds OK Pa. Blues merger ... but state approval promises to be more difficult.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2007 Jun; 37(23):10. PubMed ID: 17612001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Hospital stays decline for Blues' patients.
Purch Adm; 1980 Apr; 4(3):27. PubMed ID: 10245760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Reforming health care delivery: the Massachusetts Blues' role.
Getson J
Bus Health; 1987 Feb; 4(4):30-4. PubMed ID: 10280664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The remaking of the Blues.
Findlay S
Bus Health; 1994 Aug; 12(8):37-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10136772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Settling up. Texas Blues agrees to get rid of ranking system.
Blesch G
Mod Healthc; 2009 Apr; 39(16):14-5. PubMed ID: 19422134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Blues' cooperation, innovation key to retaining industry position.
Richman D
Mod Healthc; 1986 Jan; 16(3):40-1, 44-6. PubMed ID: 10275201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Society granted right to challenge Highmark merger.
Pa Med; 1999 Mar; 102(3):4. PubMed ID: 10097604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing the role of the Blues plans' all-payer clearinghouses.
Pierce C
Health Data Manag; 1995 Sep; 3(8):65-6, 69-70. PubMed ID: 10151204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
