These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients. Manivannan M; Periyasamy R; Narayanamurthy VB Prim Care Diabetes; 2009 Feb; 3(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 19071079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative measurement of vibratory perception threshold using a new vibrometer TM-31A. Kamon N J Occup Med; 1994 Sep; 36(9):989-96. PubMed ID: 7823221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the new indicator test for sudomotor function (Neuropad) with the vibration perception threshold and the clinical examination in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Papanas N; Papatheodorou K; Papazoglou D; Monastiriotis C; Christakidis D; Maltezos E Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes; 2008 Feb; 116(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 18095233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of age-related plantar-surface insensitivity and onset age of advanced insensitivity in older adults using vibratory and touch sensation tests. Perry SD Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):62-7. PubMed ID: 16183200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Non-invasive diagnosis of angiopathies and neuropathies in screening for the diabetic foot syndrome]. Jirkovská A; Wosková V; Bartos V; Skibová J Vnitr Lek; 1998 May; 44(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 9820070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of clinical examination, current and vibratory perception threshold in diabetic polyneuropathy. Tack CJ; Netten PM; Scheepers MH; Meijer JW; Smits P; Lutterman J Neth J Med; 1994 Feb; 44(2):41-9. PubMed ID: 8208323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolated use of vibration perception thresholds and semmes-weinstein monofilament in diagnosing diabetic polyneuropathy: "the North Catalonia diabetes study". Jurado J; Ybarra J; Pou JM Nurs Clin North Am; 2007 Mar; 42(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 17270590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the monofilament with other testing modalities for foot ulcer susceptibility. Miranda-Palma B; Sosenko JM; Bowker JH; Mizel MS; Boulton AJ Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 70(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 16126117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The natural history of diabetic peripheral neuropathy determined by a 12 year prospective study using vibration perception thresholds. Coppini DV; Wellmer A; Weng C; Young PJ; Anand P; Sönksen PH J Clin Neurosci; 2001 Nov; 8(6):520-4. PubMed ID: 11683597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Possible sources of discrepancies in the use of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Impact on prevalence of insensate foot and workload requirements. McGill M; Molyneaux L; Spencer R; Heng LF; Yue DK Diabetes Care; 1999 Apr; 22(4):598-602. PubMed ID: 10189538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration: a comparison between measurement of vibration perception threshold and 10-g monofilament test. Richard JL; Reilhes L; Buvry S; Goletto M; Faillie JL Int Wound J; 2014 Apr; 11(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 22892021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does anodyne light therapy improve peripheral neuropathy in diabetes? A double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized trial to evaluate monochromatic infrared photoenergy. Lavery LA; Murdoch DP; Williams J; Lavery DC Diabetes Care; 2008 Feb; 31(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 17977931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Neuropad test for sudomotor function to predict the risk of diabetic foot ulceration]. Qin Y; Cao Y; Gao F; Luo X; Li J; Fu X; Xue Y Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2014 Apr; 34(4):560-2. PubMed ID: 24752109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative vibration perception threshold in assessing diabetic neuropathy: is the cut-off value lower for Indian subjects? [Q-VADIS Study]. Ghosal S; Stephens J; Mukherjee A Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2012; 6(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 23153975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prolonged mechanical noise restores tactile sense in diabetic neuropathic patients. Cloutier R; Horr S; Niemi JB; D'Andrea S; Lima C; Harry JD; Veves A Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2009 Mar; 8(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 19129201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 4.5-gram monofilament sensation beneath both first metatarsal heads indicates protective foot sensation in diabetic patients. Saltzman CL; Rashid R; Hayes A; Fellner C; Fitzpatrick D; Klapach A; Frantz R; Hillis SL J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):717-23. PubMed ID: 15069135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome on diabetic foot complications in relation to clinical examination and quantitative sensory testing: a case-control study. Coppini DV; Young PJ; Weng C; Macleod AF; Sönksen PH Diabet Med; 1998 Sep; 15(9):765-71. PubMed ID: 9737806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]