These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9697758)
1. Patent clash looming over cloning techniques? Butler D Nature; 1998 Jul; 394(6692):409. PubMed ID: 9697758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. UH researcher files transgenesis suit. University of Hawaii. Watanabe M Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Sep; 17(9):841. PubMed ID: 10471912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cloning's owners go to war. Aldhous P Nature; 2000 Jun; 405(6787):610-2. PubMed ID: 10864298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. But linked to patent law. Ready T Nat Med; 2002 Aug; 8(8):771. PubMed ID: 12152022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 'Dolly' team wins further patents. Aldhous P Nature; 2000 Jun; 405(6790):986. PubMed ID: 10890411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Issue of patents on 'Dolly' technology stirs controversy. Wadman M Nature; 2000 Jan; 403(6768):351-2. PubMed ID: 10667761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Who owns my DNA?: the national and international intellectual property law on human embryonic tissue and cloning. Knowles SM; Adams SD Cumberland Law Rev; 2001-2002; 32(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 12645552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hwang work granted patent. Cyranoski D Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7213):571. PubMed ID: 18833236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recommended response for human cloning patent applications. Nash D IDEA J Law Technol; 2002; 42(2):279-312. PubMed ID: 15732181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Intellectual property. U.S. patent reform begins long journey through Congress. Kintisch E Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5729):1725-6. PubMed ID: 15961638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Intellectual property. U.S. Patent Office casts doubt on Wisconsin stem cell patents. Holden C Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):182. PubMed ID: 17431141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Monsters at the patent office: the inconsistent conclusions of moral utility and the controversy of human cloning. Smith AR De Paul Law Rev; 2003; 53(1):159-203. PubMed ID: 15568254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. First UK patents for cloning issued to creators of Dolly the sheep. Mayor S BMJ; 2000 Jan; 320(7230):270. PubMed ID: 10650016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Science and the law. Working through the patent problem. Walsh JP; Cohen WM; Arora A Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1021. PubMed ID: 12586928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Human cloning research in Japan: a study in science, culture, morality, and patent law. Borowski CM Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1999; 9(2):505-35. PubMed ID: 12666679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cloning human organs: potential sources and property implications. Hilmert LJ Indiana Law J; 2002; 77(2):363-87. PubMed ID: 15174442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Nuclear transfer cloning and the United Nations. Perry AC Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1506-8. PubMed ID: 15583651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Enforcing pharmaceutical and biotech patent rights in China. Zhang YP; Deng MM Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1235-40. PubMed ID: 18997760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Dolly, Polly et al.: cloning by somatic cell nucleus transfer]. Moradpour D; Blum HE Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1999 Mar; 124(9):255-6. PubMed ID: 10102011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]