These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9697795)

  • 1. Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Govier FE; Gibbons RP; Correa RJ; Pritchett TR; Kramer-Levien D
    Urology; 1998 Aug; 52(2):282-6. PubMed ID: 9697795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term mechanical reliability of multicomponent inflatable penile prosthesis: comparison of device survival.
    Dubocq F; Tefilli MV; Gheiler EL; Li H; Dhabuwala CB
    Urology; 1998 Aug; 52(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 9697794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-piece inflatable penile prostheses can be safely implanted after radical prostatectomy through a transverse scrotal incision.
    Lane BR; Abouassaly R; Angermeier KW; Montague DK
    Urology; 2007 Sep; 70(3):539-42. PubMed ID: 17686509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Pelvic Radiation: Technical Considerations and Contemporary Outcomes.
    Loh-Doyle J; Patil MB; Nakhoda Z; Nassiri N; Yip W; Wayne K; Doumanian L; Boyd SD
    J Sex Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):1049-1054. PubMed ID: 29731428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients.
    Montorsi F; Rigatti P; Carmignani G; Corbu C; Campo B; Ordesi G; Breda G; Silvestre P; Giammusso B; Morgia G; Graziottin A
    Eur Urol; 2000 Jan; 37(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 10671785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.
    Chierigo F; Capogrosso P; Dehò F; Pozzi E; Schifano N; Belladelli F; Montorsi F; Salonia A
    J Sex Med; 2019 Nov; 16(11):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie's disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
    Chung E; Solomon M; DeYoung L; Brock GB
    J Sex Med; 2013 Nov; 10(11):2855-60. PubMed ID: 23210973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ambicor Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Background and Contemporary Outcomes.
    Ko OS; Bennett NE
    Sex Med Rev; 2018 Apr; 6(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 28874326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700 series inflatable penile prostheses: comparison of CX/CXM and Ultrex cylinders.
    Daitch JA; Angermeier KW; Lakin MM; Ingleright BJ; Montague DK
    J Urol; 1997 Oct; 158(4):1400-2. PubMed ID: 9302130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis has high mechanical reliability at long-term follow-up.
    Kim DS; Yang KM; Chung HJ; Choi HM; Choi YD; Choi HK
    J Sex Med; 2010 Jul; 7(7):2602-7. PubMed ID: 20384938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraluminal device pressures in 3-piece inflatable penile prostheses: the "pathophysiology" of mechanical malfunction.
    Pescatori ES; Goldstein I
    J Urol; 1993 Feb; 149(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 8426405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term infection rates in diabetic patients implanted with antibiotic-impregnated versus nonimpregnated inflatable penile prostheses: 7-year outcomes.
    Mulcahy JJ; Carson CC
    Eur Urol; 2011 Jul; 60(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 21316145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Device profile of the Ambicor two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis for treatment of erectile dysfunction: overview of its safety and efficacy.
    Simon DP; Alter K; Bajic P; Levine LA
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Jan; 18(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 33206574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A survey of patients with inflatable penile prostheses: assessment of timing and frequency of intercourse and analysis of implant durability.
    Henry GD; Brinkman MJ; Mead SF; Delk JR; Cleves MA; Jennermann C; Wilson SK; Kramer AC
    J Sex Med; 2012 Jun; 9(6):1715-21. PubMed ID: 22568579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Development of Modern Penile Implants.
    Mulcahy JJ
    Sex Med Rev; 2016 Apr; 4(2):177-89. PubMed ID: 27530383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intermediate term assessment of the reliability, function and patient satisfaction with the AMS700 Ultrex penile prosthesis.
    Holloway FB; Farah RN
    J Urol; 1997 May; 157(5):1687-91. PubMed ID: 9112506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term revision rate due to infection in hydrophilic-coated inflatable penile prostheses: 11-year follow-up.
    Serefoglu EC; Mandava SH; Gokce A; Chouhan JD; Wilson SK; Hellstrom WJ
    J Sex Med; 2012 Aug; 9(8):2182-6. PubMed ID: 22759917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study.
    Levine LA; Estrada CR; Morgentaler A
    J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 11490249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis.
    Lux M; Reyes-Vallejo L; Morgentaler A; Levine LA
    J Urol; 2007 Jan; 177(1):262-6. PubMed ID: 17162061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical experience with the Mentor Alpha-1 inflatable penile prosthesis: report on 65 patients.
    Jensen JB; Larsen EH; Kirkeby HJ; Jensen KM
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2005; 39(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 15764275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.