135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9699050)
1. Comparison of resistive index versus pulsatility index in assessing the benign etiology of adnexal masses.
Angeid-Backman E; Coleman BG; Arger PH; Jacobs JE; Langer JE; Horii S
Clin Imaging; 1998; 22(4):284-91. PubMed ID: 9699050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of color Doppler in diagnosis of endometriomas.
Aleem F; Pennisi J; Zeitoun K; Predanic M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 5(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 7850591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: differences in blood flow impedance in benign and malignant lesions.
Hamper UM; Sheth S; Abbas FM; Rosenshein NB; Aronson D; Kurman RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1225-8. PubMed ID: 8498222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sonography of ovarian masses: poor sensitivity of resistive index for identifying malignant lesions.
Levine D; Feldstein VA; Babcook CJ; Filly RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1355-9. PubMed ID: 8191998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits and limitations of ultrasonographic evaluation of uterine adnexal lesions in early detection of ovarian cancer.
Varras M
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2004; 31(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 15266758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transvaginal color Doppler and CA125 as tools in the differential diagnosis of postmenopausal ovarian masses.
Botsis D; Kassanos D; Kalogirou D; Karakitsos P; Liapis A; Antoniou G
Maturitas; 1997 Apr; 26(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 9147352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blood flow characteristics of ovarian tumors: implications for ovarian cancer screening.
Carter JR; Lau M; Fowler JM; Carlson JW; Carson LF; Twiggs LB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 172(3):901-7. PubMed ID: 7892883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. E-flow doppler indices for prediction of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.
Tongsong T; Wanapirak C; Neeyalavira V; Khunamornpong S; Sukpan K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 19469642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Color Doppler blood flow measurements and microvessel density assessment in ovarian tumors].
Czekierdowski A; Szymański M; Szumiło J; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):695-700. PubMed ID: 14674110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Color Doppler ultrasound in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses.
Zanetta G; Vergani P; Lissoni A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Sep; 73(8):637-41. PubMed ID: 7941989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transvaginal ultrasonography of pelvic masses: evaluation of B-mode technique and Doppler ultrasonography.
Rehn M; Lohmann K; Rempen A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 8694082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complex pelvic mass as a target of evaluation of vessel distribution by color Doppler sonography for the diagnosis of adnexal malignancies: results of a multicenter European study.
Guerriero S; Alcazar JL; Coccia ME; Ajossa S; Scarselli G; Boi M; Gerada M; Melis GB
J Ultrasound Med; 2002 Oct; 21(10):1105-11. PubMed ID: 12369665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of colour and pulsed Doppler US and tumour marker CA 125 in differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Antonić J; Rakar S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1996; 17(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8750512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ovarian masses: can benign and malignant lesions be differentiated with color and pulsed Doppler US?
Brown DL; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Doubilet PM; Benson CB; Waitzkin ED; Muto MG
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 8284377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Serial assessment of adnexal masses with transvaginal color Doppler sonography.
Fleischer AC; Cullinan JA; Jones HW; Peery CV; Bluth RF; Kepple DM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 7571136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of intratumoural indices of blood flow velocity and impedance for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Tailor A; Jurkovic D; Bourne TH; Natucci M; Collins WP; Campbell S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(7):837-43. PubMed ID: 8923703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of resistive index for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian masses.
Majeed H; Ramzan A; Imran F; Mahfooz-ur-Rehman
J Pak Med Assoc; 2011 Nov; 61(11):1104-7. PubMed ID: 22125988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features.
Brown DL; Doubilet PM; Miller FH; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Benson CB; Lerner MH
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 9646799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
