These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9699080)

  • 21. Sick day management using blood 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-OHB) compared with urine ketone monitoring reduces hospital visits in young people with T1DM: a randomized clinical trial.
    Laffel LM; Wentzell K; Loughlin C; Tovar A; Moltz K; Brink S
    Diabet Med; 2006 Mar; 23(3):278-84. PubMed ID: 16492211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of lancets for pain perception and capillary blood volume for glucose monitoring.
    Warunek D; Stankovic AK
    Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 21(4):215-8. PubMed ID: 19174981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Possibilities of assessment of the Glucosignal in patient self-monitoring. 2. The glucose Reco GFM mini-photometer].
    Ziems J; Kretzschmar F; Pfützner L; Schild B; Klemm M; Rentsch W; Gottschling D; Pusch H; Honigmann G; Dehmlow P
    Z Med Lab Diagn; 1988; 29(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 3223021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Rapid measurement of blood glucose: a survey].
    Suzuki H
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Jan; 56 Suppl 3():761-5. PubMed ID: 9513509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Options for the Development of Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring: Is Nanotechnology an Option to Break the Boundaries?
    Thomas A; Heinemann L; Ramírez A; Zehe A
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 May; 10(3):782-9. PubMed ID: 26581879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An overview of minimally invasive technologies.
    Ginsberg BH
    Clin Chem; 1992 Sep; 38(9):1596-600. PubMed ID: 1525986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of arterial blood for glucose measurement by reflectance.
    Pressly KB; Batteiger TH; Barnett DZ; Woodie ME
    Nurs Res; 1990; 39(6):371-3. PubMed ID: 2092312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis: Glucose testing of blood samples from alternate sites--state of affairs.
    Peled N
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Aug; 7(4):609-11. PubMed ID: 16120034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Making an imprint on blood glucose monitoring.
    Wilson GS
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Apr; 15(4):322. PubMed ID: 9094128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A study of forearm versus finger stick. Blood glucose monitoring.
    Lee D; Weinert S; Miller E
    Diabetes Educ; 2001 Jun; Suppl():6p. PubMed ID: 12211930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Non-invasive blood glucose measurement of 95% certainty by pressure regulated Mid-IR.
    Chen JY; Zhou Q; Xu G; Wang RT; Tai EG; Xie L; Zhang Q; Guan Y; Huang X
    Talanta; 2019 May; 197():211-217. PubMed ID: 30771926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Noninvasive Glucose Sensing In Vivo.
    Leung HMC; Forlenza GP; Prioleau TO; Zhou X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(16):. PubMed ID: 37631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hypoglycaemia detection and prediction techniques: A systematic review on the latest developments.
    Diouri O; Cigler M; Vettoretti M; Mader JK; Choudhary P; Renard E;
    Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2021 Oct; 37(7):e3449. PubMed ID: 33763974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Wearable Skin Sensors and Their Challenges: A Review of Transdermal, Optical, and Mechanical Sensors.
    Ahmad Tarar A; Mohammad U; K Srivastava S
    Biosensors (Basel); 2020 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 32481598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pregnancy diabetes: A comparison of diagnostic protocols based on point-of-care, routine and optimized laboratory conditions.
    van den Berg SA; de Groot MJ; Salden LP; Draad PJ; Dijkstra IM; Lunshof S; van Thiel SW; Boonen KJ; Thelen MH
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16302. PubMed ID: 26542612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Promising Role of Exfoliative Cytology in the Evaluation of Glycaemic Status of Type II Diabetics: A Pilot Study.
    Satpathy Y; Kumar PS; Singh N
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2015 Jun; 14(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 26028836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison between one-point calibration and two-point calibration approaches in a continuous glucose monitoring algorithm.
    Mahmoudi Z; Johansen MD; Christiansen JS; Hejlesen O
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 8(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 24876420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimizing the impact of time lag variability on accuracy evaluation of continuous glucose monitoring systems.
    Scuffi C; Lucarelli F; Valgimigli F
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Nov; 6(6):1383-91. PubMed ID: 23294784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigation of noise-induced instabilities in quantitative biological spectroscopy and its implications for noninvasive glucose monitoring.
    Barman I; Dingari NC; Singh GP; Soares JS; Dasari RR; Smulko JM
    Anal Chem; 2012 Oct; 84(19):8149-56. PubMed ID: 22950485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigation of the specificity of Raman spectroscopy in non-invasive blood glucose measurements.
    Dingari NC; Barman I; Singh GP; Kang JW; Dasari RR; Feld MS
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2011 Jul; 400(9):2871-80. PubMed ID: 21509482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.