These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
608 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9699406)
1. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Pizzoni L; Ravnholt G; Melsen B Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 9699406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study. Husain N; Kumar A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations. Monteiro MR; Silva LE; Elias CN; Vilella Ode V J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 22(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 25025564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination. Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys. Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations. Loftus BP; Artun J; Nicholls JI; Alonzo TA; Stoner JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 10474108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets. Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Ricciardi A; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 14560269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets. Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires. Leite VV; Lopes MB; Gonini Júnior A; Almeida MR; Moura SK; Almeida RR Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 25162575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets. Cordasco G; Farronato G; Festa F; Nucera R; Parazzoli E; Grossi GB Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 19797412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model. Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules. Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 12226612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets. Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments. Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the friction forces delivered by different elastomeric patterns and metal ligature on conventional metal brackets with a NiTi arch wire versus a self-ligating system: An in vitro study. Pieroni M; Ferraz Facury AGB; Santamaria-Jr M; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Vedovello Filho M; Costa AR; Neves JG Int Orthod; 2022 Jun; 20(2):100633. PubMed ID: 35339407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states. Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 11606960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of friction forces between stainless steel wires and "reduced-friction" self-ligating brackets. Reznikov N; Har-Zion G; Barkana I; Abed Y; Redlich M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 20816303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]