These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9699443)

  • 1. Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives.
    Gordan VV; Boyer D; Söderholm KJ
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 9699443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth.
    Agostini FG; Kaaden C; Powers JM
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 11800447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer cements using resin bonding systems.
    Pereira PN; Yamada T; Inokoshi S; Burrow MF; Sano H; Tagami J
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):479-85. PubMed ID: 9699441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentin and enamel bond strengths of dual-cure composite luting agents used with dual-cure dental adhesives.
    Ritter AV; Ghaname E; Pimenta LA
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18926614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin.
    Burrow MF; Nopnakeepong U; Phrukkanon S
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 11823016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers to enamel, dentine and enamel-dentine complex bonded with different adhesive luting systems.
    Öztürk E; Bolay Ş; Hickel R; Ilie N
    J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 22521701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives.
    Rosa BT; Perdigão J
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 11203947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles?
    Chen C; Niu LN; Xie H; Zhang ZY; Zhou LQ; Jiao K; Chen JH; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):525-36. PubMed ID: 25797702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bonding amalgam to enamel: shear bond strength and SEM morphology.
    Dhanasomboon S; Nikaido T; Shimada Y; Tagami J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 11552167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonding efficiency and interfacial morphology of one-bottle adhesives to contaminated dentin surfaces.
    Abdalla AI; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1998 Dec; 11(6):281-5. PubMed ID: 10477979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resistance of ten contemporary adhesives to resin-dentine bond degradation.
    Osorio R; Pisani-Proenca J; Erhardt MC; Osorio E; Aguilera FS; Tay FR; Toledano M
    J Dent; 2008 Feb; 36(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18248872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sealing ability and bond strength of four contemporary adhesives to enamel and to dentine.
    Atash R; Vanden Abbeele A
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Dec; 6(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 16426117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems.
    Bishara SE; Gordan VV; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9878954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Penetration of radiocalcium at the margins of resin and glass ionomer dentine bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth.
    Tulunoglu O; Tulunoglu I; Ulusu T; Genç Y
    J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):481-6. PubMed ID: 10960751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.