These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 970013)
1. [Outline for the control of the course of fetal growth]. Prenzlau P; Issel EP Zentralbl Gynakol; 1976; 98(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 970013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Ultrasonic findings on the fetal biparietal diameter in normal pregnancy. Distribution in percentiles of a population sample of the Province of Pesaro-Urbino]. De Marchi C; Zauli F; Perolo F Riv Ital Ginecol; 1976; 57(4-6):417-23. PubMed ID: 1052387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Indications of ultrasonography in perinatal medicine (author's transl)]. Kratochwil A Padiatr Padol; 1982; 17(2):341-52. PubMed ID: 7099687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early fetal size and growth as predictors of adverse outcome. Pedersen NG; Figueras F; Wøjdemann KR; Tabor A; Gardosi J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 18827118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current status of fetal age and growth assessment. Chervenak FA; Jeanty P; Hobbins JC Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Dec; 10(3):423-44. PubMed ID: 6360462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship of fetal limb lengths to both biparietal diameter and gestational age. Seeds JW; Cefalo RC Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Dec; 60(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 7145264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Significance of various parameters of ultrasonic fetometry for the weight computation of the fetus]. Ylöstalo P; Kirkinen P Zentralbl Gynakol; 1978; 100(9):551-9. PubMed ID: 676570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Case for hybrid "fetal growth curves": a population-based estimation of normal fetal size across gestational age. Bernstein IM; Mohs G; Rucquoi M; Badger GJ J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 8796781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Determination of fetal biparietal diameter by ultrasonic scanning in the assessment of the fetus and the outcome of pregnancy]. Gonen R; Mashiach S Harefuah; 1978 Jul; 95(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 700462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fetal biparietal diameter percentiles. Ultrasonic findings during normal pregnancy]. Todros T; Campogrande M Minerva Ginecol; 1976 Feb; 28(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 1256713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal cephalometry by ultrasound. The predictability of the expected date of delivery by biparietal diameter percentiles. Qvigstad E; Sande HA J Oslo City Hosp; 1978 Dec; 28(12):167-8. PubMed ID: 731347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasonic diagnosis of altered fetal growth by use of a normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve. Ott WJ; Doyle S Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 6694813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical utility of the relationship between fetal femur length and biparietal diameter. Quinlan RW; Allen G; Cruz AC J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 6726701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Determination of intrauterine fetal growth with ultrasonics]. Rondinelli M; Resta P; Laureti E Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1973 May; 94(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 4807823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Campbell S; Warsof SL; Little D; Cooper DJ Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 65(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 3885105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biometric and dynamic ultrasound assessment of small-for-dates infants: report of 260 cases. Kurjak A; Kirkinen P; Latin V Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 7437105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]