112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 970013)
1. [Outline for the control of the course of fetal growth].
Prenzlau P; Issel EP
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1976; 98(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 970013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Ultrasonic findings on the fetal biparietal diameter in normal pregnancy. Distribution in percentiles of a population sample of the Province of Pesaro-Urbino].
De Marchi C; Zauli F; Perolo F
Riv Ital Ginecol; 1976; 57(4-6):417-23. PubMed ID: 1052387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Indications of ultrasonography in perinatal medicine (author's transl)].
Kratochwil A
Padiatr Padol; 1982; 17(2):341-52. PubMed ID: 7099687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early fetal size and growth as predictors of adverse outcome.
Pedersen NG; Figueras F; Wøjdemann KR; Tabor A; Gardosi J
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 18827118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current status of fetal age and growth assessment.
Chervenak FA; Jeanty P; Hobbins JC
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Dec; 10(3):423-44. PubMed ID: 6360462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship of fetal limb lengths to both biparietal diameter and gestational age.
Seeds JW; Cefalo RC
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Dec; 60(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 7145264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Significance of various parameters of ultrasonic fetometry for the weight computation of the fetus].
Ylöstalo P; Kirkinen P
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1978; 100(9):551-9. PubMed ID: 676570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Case for hybrid "fetal growth curves": a population-based estimation of normal fetal size across gestational age.
Bernstein IM; Mohs G; Rucquoi M; Badger GJ
J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 8796781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Determination of fetal biparietal diameter by ultrasonic scanning in the assessment of the fetus and the outcome of pregnancy].
Gonen R; Mashiach S
Harefuah; 1978 Jul; 95(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 700462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fetal biparietal diameter percentiles. Ultrasonic findings during normal pregnancy].
Todros T; Campogrande M
Minerva Ginecol; 1976 Feb; 28(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 1256713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal cephalometry by ultrasound. The predictability of the expected date of delivery by biparietal diameter percentiles.
Qvigstad E; Sande HA
J Oslo City Hosp; 1978 Dec; 28(12):167-8. PubMed ID: 731347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasonic diagnosis of altered fetal growth by use of a normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve.
Ott WJ; Doyle S
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 6694813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical utility of the relationship between fetal femur length and biparietal diameter.
Quinlan RW; Allen G; Cruz AC
J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 6726701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrauterine growth in twin pregnancies: prediction of fetal growth retardation.
Secher NJ; Kaern J; Hansen PK
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jul; 66(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 3892389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Determination of intrauterine fetal growth with ultrasonics].
Rondinelli M; Resta P; Laureti E
Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1973 May; 94(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 4807823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Methods of combined antenatal diagnosis of maturity].
Rauchfuss R; Liedtke MP
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1976; 98(13):774-9. PubMed ID: 961181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age.
Campbell S; Warsof SL; Little D; Cooper DJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 65(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 3885105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biometric and dynamic ultrasound assessment of small-for-dates infants: report of 260 cases.
Kurjak A; Kirkinen P; Latin V
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 7437105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diminished biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference growth in twins.
Socol ML; Tamura RK; Sabbagha RE; Chen T; Vaisrub N
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Aug; 64(2):235-8. PubMed ID: 6738957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Value of ultrasonic fetometry for fetal monitoring in diabetes mellitus].
Semmler K; Fuhrmann K; Issel EP; Prenzlau P
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1978; 100(12):788-98. PubMed ID: 685561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
