These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9700807)

  • 1. A word-superiority effect in the presence of foveal load.
    Salvemini AV; Stewart AL; Purcell DG; Pinkham RS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1311-9. PubMed ID: 9700807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of foveal load and visual context on peripheral letter recognition.
    Salvemini AV; Stewart AL; Purcell DG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1996 Aug; 92(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 8782427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Foveal crowding in posterior cortical atrophy: a specific early-visual-processing deficit affecting word reading.
    Crutch SJ; Warrington EK
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 Dec; 24(8):843-66. PubMed ID: 18161498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parafoveal processing in word recognition.
    Kennedy A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):429-55. PubMed ID: 10881613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parafoveal processing in reading.
    Schotter ER; Angele B; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 22042596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of ocular transverse chromatic aberration on near foveal letter recognition.
    Yang SN; Tai YC; Laukkanen H; Sheedy J
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(23):2881-90. PubMed ID: 19761785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of foveal distractors on saccadic eye movements: a dead zone for the global effect.
    Vitu F; Lancelin D; Jean A; Farioli F
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4684-708. PubMed ID: 17049960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The optimal use of non-optimal letter information in foveal and parafoveal word recognition.
    Bernard JB; Castet E
    Vision Res; 2019 Feb; 155():44-61. PubMed ID: 30629974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of ocular transverse chromatic aberration on peripheral word identification.
    Yang SN; Tai YC; Laukkanen H; Sheedy JE
    Vision Res; 2011 Nov; 51(21-22):2273-81. PubMed ID: 21945482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word processing in the parafoveal region.
    Lee CH; Kim K
    Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 22029615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parafoveal word perception: a further case against semantic preprocessing.
    Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Feb; 8(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 6460079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric representation of the central retina of commissurotomized subjects.
    Sugishita M; Hamilton CR; Sakuma I; Hemmi I
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Apr; 32(4):399-415. PubMed ID: 8047248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 9(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 19246332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.