98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9701962)
1. Item-specific effects in recognition failure: reasons for rejection of the Tulving-Wiseman function.
Lian A; Glass AL; Raanaas RK
Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):692-707. PubMed ID: 9701962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exceptions to recognition failure as a function of the encoded association between cue and target.
Bryant DJ
Mem Cognit; 1991 Mar; 19(2):210-9. PubMed ID: 2017044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory.
Kormi-Nouri R; Nilsson LG
Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 9701961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recognition failure of categorised words: further evidence of exceptions.
Gardiner JM; Mäntylä T; Nilsson LG
Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 8556534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mathematical constraints and the Tulving-Wiseman law: a rejoinder.
Gardiner JM; Nilsson LG
Memory; 1993 Sep; 1(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 7584269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm.
Riefer DM; Batchelder WH
Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):611-30. PubMed ID: 7476247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Tulving-Wiseman law and the recognition of recallable music.
Gardiner JM; Kaminska Z; Java RI; Clarke EF; Mayer P
Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):632-7. PubMed ID: 2266864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recognition failure and integration.
Arlemalm T; Nilsson LG
Scand J Psychol; 1994 Sep; 35(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 7939489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Encoding specificity: retrieval asymmetry in the recognition failure paradigm.
Bartling CA; Thompson CP
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1977 Nov; 3(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 915447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recognition failure of recallable words and recognizable words.
Wallace WP
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1978 Sep; 4(5):441-52. PubMed ID: 690576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic and directed search processes in solving simple semantic-memory problems.
Ben-Zur H
Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 2796746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Duaal processes in recognition and in recognition failure.
Richard Hanley J
Mem Cognit; 1984 Nov; 12(6):575-80. PubMed ID: 21287047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modulation of event-related brain potentials by word repetition: effects of local context.
Rugg MD; Doyle MC; Holdstock JS
Psychophysiology; 1994 Sep; 31(5):447-59. PubMed ID: 7972599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Associations compete directly in memory.
Caplan JB; Rehani M; Andrews JC
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 May; 67(5):955-78. PubMed ID: 24131316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited.
Verde MF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1433-48. PubMed ID: 23687918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tests of the separate retrieval of item and associative information using a frequency-judgment task.
Hockley WE; Cristi C
Mem Cognit; 1996 Nov; 24(6):796-811. PubMed ID: 8961823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.
Clark SE
Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 1508049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A study of relative-position priming with superset primes.
Van Assche E; Grainger J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):399-415. PubMed ID: 16569155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
