These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9701972)

  • 1. Letter legibility and visual word recognition.
    Nazir TA; Jacobs AM; O'Regan JK
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):810-21. PubMed ID: 9701972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The optimal use of non-optimal letter information in foveal and parafoveal word recognition.
    Bernard JB; Castet E
    Vision Res; 2019 Feb; 155():44-61. PubMed ID: 30629974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Letter visibility and word recognition: the optimal viewing position in printed words.
    Nazir TA; Heller D; Sussmann C
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Sep; 52(3):315-28. PubMed ID: 1408642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Third and fifth graders' processing of parafoveal information in reading: A study in single-word recognition.
    Khelifi R; Sparrow L; Casalis S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Nov; 139():1-17. PubMed ID: 26057197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words.
    Nazir TA; Ben-Boutayab N; Decoppet N; Deutsch A; Frost R
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):294-311. PubMed ID: 14967213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual letter similarity effects during sentence reading: Evidence from the boundary technique.
    Marcet A; Perea M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():142-149. PubMed ID: 30119047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the optimal viewing position in reading influenced by familiarity of the letter string?
    Auclair L; Chokron S
    Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):20-4. PubMed ID: 11527329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Optimal Viewing Position effect in the lower visual field.
    Yao-N'dré M; Castet E; Vitu F
    Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 76():114-23. PubMed ID: 23159419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PURE ALEXIA AND THE VIEWING POSITION EFFECT IN PRINTED WORDS.
    Montant M; Nazir TA; Poncet M
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 1998 Mar; 15(1-2):93-140. PubMed ID: 28657522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading.
    Clark JJ; O'Regan JK
    Vision Res; 1999 Feb; 39(4):843-57. PubMed ID: 10341970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of crowding on eye movement patterns in reading.
    Bricolo E; Salvi C; Martelli M; Arduino LS; Daini R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():23-34. PubMed ID: 26143298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When your mind skips what your eyes fixate: How forced fixations lead to comprehension illusions in reading.
    Schotter ER; Leinenger M; von der Malsburg T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1884-1890. PubMed ID: 28766185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociating spatial and letter-based word length effects observed in readers' eye movement patterns.
    Hautala J; Hyönä J; Aro M
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1719-27. PubMed ID: 21664920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tests of a model of multi-word reading: effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition.
    Grainger J; Mathôt S; Vitu F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():35-40. PubMed ID: 24370788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.