These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 970220)

  • 1. Absorbed dose in mammary radiography.
    Karlsson M; Nygren K; Wickman G; Hettinger G
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1976 Jun; 15(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 970220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
    Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of absorbed dose in mammography: monte carlo simulation studies.
    Doi K; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1980 Apr; 135(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 7360961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN A BREAST UNDERGOING MAMMOGRAPHY BASED ON A 3D DETAILED BREAST MODEL FOR CHINESE WOMEN.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Feng Z; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(3):221-228. PubMed ID: 29438509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relative biological effectiveness of low-dose mammography quality X rays in the human breast MCF-10A cell line.
    Mills CE; Thome C; Koff D; Andrews DW; Boreham DR
    Radiat Res; 2015 Jan; 183(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 25536231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees.
    Brnić Z; Hebrang A
    Eur J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 40(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 11673002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of absorbed radiation dose in refraction-enhanced breast tomosynthesis by a Laue case analyser.
    Sato H; Ando M; Shimao D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):231-3. PubMed ID: 21515613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Dosimetry in scintimammography by (99m)Tc-MIBI, (99m)Tc-Tetrofosmin, (99m)Tc-(V)DMSA and 201TlCl compared with X-rays mammography].
    Lyra M; Vamvakas I
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2009; 12(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 19675881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Radiation exposure in x-ray mammography].
    Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R
    Rofo; 2001 Feb; 173(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 11253092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Absorption dose in scintimammography and in X-rays mammography].
    Lyra M; Vamvakas I; Gavriilelli M; Chatzigiannis C
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2010; 13(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20411183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose in mammography: an energy-balance approach.
    Shrivastava PN
    Radiology; 1981 Aug; 140(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 7255726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
    Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
    James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
    Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.
    Hammerstein GR; Miller DW; White DR; Masterson ME; Woodard HQ; Laughlin JS
    Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 760167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years.
    Huda W; Nickoloff EL; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5713-28. PubMed ID: 19175129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New aspects in evaluation of the average-absorbed dose of the parenchyma in mammography (author's transl)].
    Schneider G; Kindl P; Spreizer H
    Rofo; 1978 Jan; 128(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 146669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetric aspects of film/screen mammography: in-phantom dosimetry with thimble-type ionisation chambers.
    Zoetelief J; de Wit NJ; Broerse JJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Sep; 34(9):1169-77. PubMed ID: 2798557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.