128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9702494)
1. Differences between false-negative and true-positive Papanicolaou smears on Papnet-assisted review.
Mitchell H; Medley G
Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Aug; 19(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 9702494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Observer variation in cytologic grading for cervical dysplasia of Papanicolaou smears with the PAPNET testing system.
Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; van den Tweel JG
Cancer; 1999 Aug; 87(4):178-83. PubMed ID: 10455204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW
JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Negative cervical smears before CIN 3/carcinoma. Reevaluation with the PAPNET Testing System.
Doornewaard H; van de Seijp H; Woudt JM; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 9022729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the PAPNET system in a general pathology service.
Farnsworth A; Chambers FM; Goldschmidt CS
Med J Aust; 1996 Oct; 165(8):429-31. PubMed ID: 8913244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PAPNET testing for HSILs. The few cell/small cell challenge.
Solomon HM; Frist S
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 9479348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Costs and outcomes of PAPNET secondary screening technology for cervical cytologic evaluation. A community hospital's experience.
Brotzman GL; Kretzchmar S; Ferguson D; Gottlieb M; Stowe C
Arch Fam Med; 1999; 8(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 9932072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost analysis of PAPNET-assisted vs. conventional Pap smear evaluation in primary screening of cervical smears.
Meerding WJ; Doornewaard H; van Ballegooijen M; Bos A; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG; van der Schouw YT; Habbema JD
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11213501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective study of PAPNET: review of 25,656 Pap smears negative on manual screening and rapid rescreening.
Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ
Cytopathology; 1999 Oct; 10(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 10588350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
Mitchell H; Medley G
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PAPNET computer-aided rescreening for detection of benign and malignant glandular elements in cervicovaginal smears: a review of 61 cases.
Sturgis CD; Isoe C; McNeal NE; Yu GH; DeFrias DV
Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Apr; 18(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 9557269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of laboratory false negative smears by the PAPNET cytologic screening system.
Mitchell H; Medley G
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 9479350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of false-negative ThinPrep cervical smears in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Leung KM; Lam KK; Tse PY; Yeoh GP; Chan KW
Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Aug; 14(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 18685162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the PAPNET system for prescreening triage of cervicovaginal smears.
Ashfaq R; Saliger F; Solares B; Thomas S; Liu G; Liang Y; Saboorian MH
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1058-64. PubMed ID: 9250299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PAPNET analysis of reportedly negative smears preceding the diagnosis of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or carcinoma.
Sherman ME; Mango LJ; Kelly D; Paull G; Ludin V; Copeland C; Solomon D; Schiffman MH
Mod Pathol; 1994 Jun; 7(5):578-81. PubMed ID: 7937724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of false-negative Pap smears using the PAPNET system.
Troni GM; Cipparrone I; Cariaggi MP; Ciatto S; Miccinesi G; Zappa M; Confortini M
Tumori; 2000; 86(6):455-7. PubMed ID: 11218185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [An interlaboratory study of the use of PapNet in the quality control of cervico-vaginal cytology].
Cosentino A; Ghidoni D; Salemi M; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Zani J; Grasso G; Bondi A
Pathologica; 1999 Apr; 91(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 10484869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
