155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9704720)
1. Routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is not cost-effective and does not increase patient comfort in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: an analysis using a Markov model.
Chouaid C; Bassinet L; Fuhrman C; Monnet I; Housset B
J Clin Oncol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):2700-7. PubMed ID: 9704720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling the cost effectiveness of secondary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during standard-dose chemotherapy.
Timmer-Bonte JN; Adang EM; Termeer E; Severens JL; Tjan-Heijnen VC
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 18182670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?
Skedgel C; Rayson D; Younis T
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jan; 24(1):387-394. PubMed ID: 26081595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of Primary Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia During Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
Yu JL; Chan K; Kurin M; Pasetka M; Kiss A; Sridhar SS; Warner E
Breast J; 2015; 21(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 26387577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by prophylactic antibiotics plus or minus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch Randomized Phase III Study.
Timmer-Bonte JN; de Boo TM; Smit HJ; Biesma B; Wilschut FA; Cheragwandi SA; Termeer A; Hensing CA; Akkermans J; Adang EM; Bootsma GP; Tjan-Heijnen VC
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(31):7974-84. PubMed ID: 16258098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence of neutropenic fever in patients treated with standard-dose combination chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer and the cost impact of treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Nichols CR; Fox EP; Roth BJ; Williams SD; Loehrer PJ; Einhorn LH
J Clin Oncol; 1994 Jun; 12(6):1245-50. PubMed ID: 7515413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-utility analysis of primary prophylaxis versus secondary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma receiving curative-intent chemotherapy.
Chan KK; Siu E; Krahn MD; Imrie K; Alibhai SM
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Apr; 30(10):1064-71. PubMed ID: 22393098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy.
Wang XJ; Tang T; Farid M; Quek R; Tao M; Lim ST; Wee HL; Chan A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148901. PubMed ID: 26871584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost effectiveness of primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer at risk of febrile neutropenia.
Aarts MJ; Grutters JP; Peters FP; Mandigers CM; Dercksen MW; Stouthard JM; Nortier HJ; van Laarhoven HW; van Warmerdam LJ; van de Wouw AJ; Jacobs EM; Mattijssen V; van der Rijt CC; Smilde TJ; van der Velden AW; Temizkan M; Batman E; Muller EW; van Gastel SM; Joore MA; Borm GF; Tjan-Heijnen VC
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 31(34):4283-9. PubMed ID: 24166522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer in the United Kingdom.
Whyte S; Cooper KL; Stevenson MD; Madan J; Akehurst R
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):465-74. PubMed ID: 21669371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Granulocyte colony--stimulating factor for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with small cell lung cancer : the 40% rule revisited.
Calhoun EA; Schumock GT; McKoy JM; Pickard S; Fitzner KA; Heckinger EA; Powell EF; McCaffrey KR; Bennett CL
Pharmacoeconomics; 2005; 23(8):767-75. PubMed ID: 16097839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost effectiveness of increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer: based on data from the Medical Research Council LU19 trial.
Bojke L; Sculpher M; Stephens R; Qian W; Thatcher N; Girling D
Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 16706570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to primary prophylaxis with antibiotics in small-cell lung cancer.
Timmer-Bonte JN; Adang EM; Smit HJ; Biesma B; Wilschut FA; Bootsma GP; de Boo TM; Tjan-Heijnen VC
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jul; 24(19):2991-7. PubMed ID: 16682725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pegfilgrastim for the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma--a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Numnum TM; Kimball KJ; Rocconi RP; Kilgore LC; Straughn JM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(5):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17386043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic implications of using pegfilgrastim rather than conventional G-CSF to prevent neutropenia during small-cell lung cancer chemotherapy.
Tan Sean P; Chouaid C; Hettler D; Baud M; Hejblum G; Tilleul P
Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jun; 25(6):1455-60. PubMed ID: 19419340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in secondary prophylaxis for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cheung MC; Prica A; Graczyk J; Buckstein R; Chan KK
Leuk Lymphoma; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1865-75. PubMed ID: 26758765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of febrile neutropenia prevention with primary versus secondary G-CSF prophylaxis for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review.
Younis T; Rayson D; Jovanovic S; Skedgel C
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Oct; 159(3):425-32. PubMed ID: 27572552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic analysis of prophylactic pegfilgrastim in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
Eldar-Lissai A; Cosler LE; Culakova E; Lyman GH
Value Health; 2008; 11(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 18380630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pharmacoeconomics of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a critical review.
Barnes G; Pathak A; Schwartzberg L
Adv Ther; 2014 Jul; 31(7):683-95. PubMed ID: 24989316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer. Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group.
Rusthoven J; Bramwell V; Stephenson B
Cancer Prev Control; 1998 Aug; 2(4):179-90. PubMed ID: 10093631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
