These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9705058)

  • 1. Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture?
    Marotta JJ; DeSouza JF; Haffenden AM; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Jun; 36(6):491-7. PubMed ID: 9705058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia.
    Marotta JJ; Behrmann M; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Aug; 116(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 9305820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements.
    Jackson SR; Newport R; Shaw A
    Curr Biol; 2002 Feb; 12(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 11839278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?
    Pavani F; Boscagli I; Benvenuti F; Rabuffetti M; Farnè A
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Jul; 127(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 10424418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.
    Aglioti S; DeSouza JF; Goodale MA
    Curr Biol; 1995 Jun; 5(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 7552179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping.
    Marotta JJ; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Aug; 121(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 9746154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements.
    Jackson SR; Shaw A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Feb; 26(1):418-23. PubMed ID: 10696627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping.
    Melmoth DR; Grant S
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):371-88. PubMed ID: 16323004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Otto-de Haart EG; Carey DP; Milne AB
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Dec; 37(13):1437-44. PubMed ID: 10617263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.
    Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Wiesner CD; Ferstl R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 16710685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects.
    Westwood DA; Dubrowski A; Carnahan H; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Dec; 135(4):535-43. PubMed ID: 11156317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual illusions modify object size estimates for prospective action judgements.
    Geers L; Pesenti M; Andres M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():211-221. PubMed ID: 29883576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of head movements in the control of manual prehension.
    Marotta JJ; Kruyer A; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 May; 120(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 9628412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: one- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment.
    Vishton PM; Fabre E
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):377-92. PubMed ID: 12858958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Matching boxes: familiar size influences action programming.
    McIntosh RD; Lashley G
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2441-4. PubMed ID: 18407302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems.
    Servos P
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 130(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 10638439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of familiar size in the control of grasping.
    Marotta JJ; Goodale MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Jan; 13(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 11224905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.
    Haffenden AM; Goodale MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jan; 10(1):122-36. PubMed ID: 9526087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.