These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9706712)

  • 1. Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition.
    Gibbs P; Van Orden GC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Aug; 24(4):1162-87. PubMed ID: 9706712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategic control of processing in word recognition.
    Stone GO; Van Orden GC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):744-74. PubMed ID: 8409857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly.
    Berent I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1727-42. PubMed ID: 9425677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.
    Wagenmakers EJ; Steyvers M; Raaijmakers JG; Shiffrin RM; van Rijn H; Zeelenberg R
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):332-67. PubMed ID: 15020215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modulation of regularity and lexicality effects in reading aloud.
    Kinoshita S; Lupker SJ; Rastle K
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1255-64. PubMed ID: 15900919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for the modulation of sub-lexical processing in go no-go naming: the elimination of the frequency × regularity interaction.
    Cummine J; Amyotte J; Pancheshen B; Chouinard B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2011 Dec; 40(5-6):367-78. PubMed ID: 21928093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resolving empirical inconsistencies concerning priming, frequency, and nonword foils in lexical decision.
    Stone GO; Van Orden GC
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 3)():295-324. PubMed ID: 1339918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal priming evidence for phonology-to-orthography activation in visual word recognition.
    Whatmough C; Arguin M; Bub D
    Brain Lang; 1999 Feb; 66(2):275-93. PubMed ID: 10190990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task.
    Gerhand S; Barry C
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jul; 27(4):592-602. PubMed ID: 10479818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lexical inhibition and sublexical facilitation are surprisingly long lasting.
    Sumner M; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):769-90. PubMed ID: 17576153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways in naming: a reevaluation.
    Kinoshita S; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 12776751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional strategic control over nonlexical and lexical processing in written spelling to dictation in adults.
    Bonin P; Collay S; Fayol M; Méot A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jan; 33(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 15915793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Homophone effects in lexical decision.
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Jared D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):139-56. PubMed ID: 11204094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for semantic involvement in regular and exception word reading in emergent readers of English.
    Ricketts J; Davies R; Masterson J; Stuart M; Duff FJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():330-345. PubMed ID: 27416563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instructions and word bias in a lexical decision task.
    Piercey CD
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Jun; 96(3 Pt 2):995-1001. PubMed ID: 16173368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones.
    Yates M; Locker L; Simpson GB
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):856-66. PubMed ID: 14651294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modulation of brain regions involved in word recognition by homophonous stimuli: an fMRI study.
    Newman RL; Joanisse MF
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():250-64. PubMed ID: 20888806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional Anatomy of Recognition of Chinese Multi-Character Words: Convergent Evidence from Effects of Transposable Nonwords, Lexicality, and Word Frequency.
    Lin N; Yu X; Zhao Y; Zhang M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149583. PubMed ID: 26901644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory.
    Heathcote A; Ditton E; Mitchell K
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jun; 34(4):826-38. PubMed ID: 17063914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.