These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Sensory and cognitive components of visual information acquisition. Busey TA; Loftus GR Psychol Rev; 1994 Jul; 101(3):446-69. PubMed ID: 7938339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Binocular combination of contrast signals. Anderson PA; Movshon JA Vision Res; 1989; 29(9):1115-32. PubMed ID: 2617860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Binocular summation of detection and resolution thresholds in the central visual field using parallel-line targets. Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Shimomura Y Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 46(8):2810-5. PubMed ID: 16043854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the binocular summation of chromatic contrast. Simmons DR; Kingdom FA Vision Res; 1998 Apr; 38(8):1063-71. PubMed ID: 9666966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binocular summation in orientation discrimination depends on stimulus contrast and duration. Bearse MA; Freeman RD Vision Res; 1994 Jan; 34(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 8116265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two eyes: square root 2 better than one? Simpson WA; Manahilov V; Shahani U Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 19406375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field. Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Matsumoto F; Shimomura Y Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):743-7. PubMed ID: 12271372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A theory of visual information acquisition and visual memory with special application to intensity-duration trade-offs. Loftus GR; Ruthruff E J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Feb; 20(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 8133224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binocular contrast interactions: dichoptic masking is not a single process. Baker DH; Meese TS Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(24):3096-107. PubMed ID: 17904610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of background complexity on visual sensitivity and binocular summation using patterns with and without noise. Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Inase M; Shimomura Y Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jan; 53(1):387-93. PubMed ID: 22167098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of binocular summation in the peripheral visual field in young and older patients. Pardhan S Curr Eye Res; 1997 Mar; 16(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 9088742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Probability summation of acuity in the human infant. Birch EE; Swanson WH Vision Res; 1992 Oct; 32(10):1999-2003. PubMed ID: 1287996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in the computation of depth. Bradshaw MF; Rogers BJ Vision Res; 1996 Nov; 36(21):3457-68. PubMed ID: 8977012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binocular visual training to promote recovery from monocular deprivation. Murphy KM; Roumeliotis G; Williams K; Beston BR; Jones DG J Vis; 2015 Jan; 15(1):15.1.2. PubMed ID: 25572348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The study on binocular visual field summation and its possible mechanism]. Luo G; Jiang F; Liang J; Liu C; Wu DZ Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2002 Dec; 18(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 15515772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient Coding Theory Predicts a Tilt Aftereffect from Viewing Untilted Patterns. May KA; Zhaoping L Curr Biol; 2016 Jun; 26(12):1571-1576. PubMed ID: 27291055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]