These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9707137)

  • 1. Comparing results from meta-analyses vs large trials.
    LeLorier J; Gregoire G
    JAMA; 1998 Aug; 280(6):518-9. PubMed ID: 9707137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
    Stewart LA; Parmar MK; Tierney JF
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):61; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
    Ioannidis JP; Cappelleri JC; Lau J
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):59; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
    Davey Smith G; Egger M
    Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9085):1182. PubMed ID: 9343537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
    Rothwell PM; Robertson G
    Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9085):1181-2. PubMed ID: 9343536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of meta-analyses and of large randomized trials in the study of cancer treatments.
    Pignon JP; Auperin A; Borget I; Hill C
    Lung Cancer; 2009 Jul; 65(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19059671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Prospectively identified trials could be used for comparison with meta-analyses.
    Langhorne P
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):471. PubMed ID: 9492689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential dangers in the customary methods of conducting meta-analyses. Lack of bias in the meta-analysis of recombinant versus urinary follicle stimulating hormone.
    Daya S; Gunby J
    Hum Reprod; 2001 Nov; 16(11):2250-2. PubMed ID: 11679498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the criteria used for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing adverse effects.
    Bonovas S; Lytras T; Nikolopoulos G
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 30(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 25773753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.
    LeLorier J; Grégoire G; Benhaddad A; Lapierre J; Derderian F
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):536-42. PubMed ID: 9262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Obtaining data from randomised controlled trials: how much do we need for reliable and informative meta-analyses?
    Clarke MJ; Stewart LA
    BMJ; 1994 Oct; 309(6960):1007-10. PubMed ID: 7950694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Not PEDro's bias: summary quality scores can be used in meta-analysis.
    Doi SA; Barendregt JJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8):940-1. PubMed ID: 23651766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
    Bent S; Kerlikowske K; Grady D
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):60; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Meta-analyses to reveal insufficient mega-trials].
    Graudal NA; Galløe AM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Jun; 160(24):3574. PubMed ID: 9641048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Pereira C; Castilho E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized Trials, Meta-Analyses, and Systematic Reviews: Using Examples from Rheumatology.
    Pope JE; Hazlewood GS
    Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2018 May; 44(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 29622296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.