These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9707939)
21. The constitutionality of the Freedom of Choice Act of 1993. Axel DA Hastings Law J; 1994; 45(3):641-65. PubMed ID: 11656418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Unburdening the undue burden standard: orienting Casey in constitutional jurisprudence. Metzger GE Columbia Law Rev; 1994; 94():2025-89. PubMed ID: 11660149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment. Caron WR Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Right to life of the unborn. Garn Je Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Jan; 127(12):S567-78. PubMed ID: 11665256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Evans v. Kelley. Bostrom BA Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 9707943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton. Finn J Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Survey of abortion law. Platt JG; O'Malley K Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Barnett BA Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework. Mangel CP Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy. Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Gordon A Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth. Field MA Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Webster and the politics of abortion. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 2703338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 1997. 105 H.R. 1122. Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 9707940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. It's my body, it's my choice: the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Kushnir TF Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2004; 35(4):1117-88. PubMed ID: 15732189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Justices to review federal ban on disputed abortion method; case may hinge on Alito, Court's newest member. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 16514736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Banning partial-birth abortions: a few inches away from testing post-viability jurisprudence. Flanagan PP Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):141-77. PubMed ID: 16514753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment. Skahn SL Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]