89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9709004)
1. Identification of the binding surface on beta-lactamase for GroEL by limited proteolysis and MALDI-mass spectrometry.
Gervasoni P; Staudenmann W; James P; Plückthun A
Biochemistry; 1998 Aug; 37(33):11660-9. PubMed ID: 9709004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protease-catalyzed incorporation of 18O into peptide fragments and its application for protein sequencing by electrospray and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.
Schnölzer M; Jedrzejewski P; Lehmann WD
Electrophoresis; 1996 May; 17(5):945-53. PubMed ID: 8783021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of linker regions and domain borders of the transcription activator protein NtrC from Escherichia coli by limited proteolysis, in-gel digestion, and mass spectrometry.
Bantscheff M; Weiss V; Glocker MO
Biochemistry; 1999 Aug; 38(34):11012-20. PubMed ID: 10460156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. II. GroEL recognizes thermally unfolded mature beta-lactamase.
Zahn R; Plückthun A
J Mol Biol; 1994 Sep; 242(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 7916382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. I. GroEL recognizes the signal sequences of beta-lactamase precursor.
Zahn R; Axmann SE; Rücknagel KP; Jaeger E; Laminet AA; Plückthun A
J Mol Biol; 1994 Sep; 242(2):150-64. PubMed ID: 7916381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two conformational states of beta-lactamase bound to GroEL: a biophysical characterization.
Gervasoni P; Gehrig P; Plückthun A
J Mol Biol; 1998 Jan; 275(4):663-75. PubMed ID: 9466939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Controlled proteolysis of amelogenins reveals exposure of both carboxy- and amino-terminal regions.
Moradian-Oldak J; Jimenez I; Maltby D; Fincham AG
Biopolymers; 2001 Jun; 58(7):606-16. PubMed ID: 11285557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GroEL recognises sequential and non-sequential linear structural motifs compatible with extended beta-strands and alpha-helices.
Chatellier J; Buckle AM; Fersht AR
J Mol Biol; 1999 Sep; 292(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 10493865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A thermophilic mini-chaperonin contains a conserved polypeptide-binding surface: combined crystallographic and NMR studies of the GroEL apical domain with implications for substrate interactions.
Hua Q; Dementieva IS; Walsh MA; Hallenga K; Weiss MA; Joachimiak A
J Mol Biol; 2001 Feb; 306(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 11178910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanism of substrate recognition by the chaperonin GroEL.
Houry WA
Biochem Cell Biol; 2001; 79(5):569-77. PubMed ID: 11716298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of common surfactants on protein digestion and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric analysis of the digested peptides using two-layer sample preparation.
Zhang N; Li L
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2004; 18(8):889-96. PubMed ID: 15095358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of vacuum matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) and atmospheric pressure MALDI (AP-MALDI) tandem mass spectrometry of 2-dimensional separated and trypsin-digested glomerular proteins for database search derived identification.
Mayrhofer C; Krieger S; Raptakis E; Allmaier G
J Proteome Res; 2006 Aug; 5(8):1967-78. PubMed ID: 16889419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry to map the quinol binding site of cytochrome bo3 from Escherichia coli.
Tsatsos PH; Reynolds K; Nickels EF; He DY; Yu CA; Gennis RB
Biochemistry; 1998 Jul; 37(28):9884-8. PubMed ID: 9665692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Folding of malate dehydrogenase inside the GroEL-GroES cavity.
Chen J; Walter S; Horwich AL; Smith DL
Nat Struct Biol; 2001 Aug; 8(8):721-8. PubMed ID: 11473265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Probing the dimeric structure of porcine aminoacylase 1 by mass spectrometric and modeling procedures.
D'Ambrosio C; Talamo F; Vitale RM; Amodeo P; Tell G; Ferrara L; Scaloni A
Biochemistry; 2003 Apr; 42(15):4430-43. PubMed ID: 12693939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Secondary structure forming propensity coupled with amphiphilicity is an optimal motif in a peptide or protein for association with chaperonin 60 (GroEL).
Preuss M; Hutchinson JP; Miller AD
Biochemistry; 1999 Aug; 38(32):10272-86. PubMed ID: 10441121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protein secondary structure and stability determined by combining exoproteolysis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
Villanueva J; Villegas V; Querol E; Avilés FX; Serrano L
J Mass Spectrom; 2002 Sep; 37(9):974-84. PubMed ID: 12271440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. cGMP-binding prepares PKG for substrate binding by disclosing the C-terminal domain.
Alverdi V; Mazon H; Versluis C; Hemrika W; Esposito G; van den Heuvel R; Scholten A; Heck AJ
J Mol Biol; 2008 Feb; 375(5):1380-93. PubMed ID: 18082764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Domain architecture of the p62 subunit from the human transcription/repair factor TFIIH deduced by limited proteolysis and mass spectrometry analysis.
Jawhari A; Boussert S; Lamour V; Atkinson RA; Kieffer B; Poch O; Potier N; van Dorsselaer A; Moras D; Poterszman A
Biochemistry; 2004 Nov; 43(45):14420-30. PubMed ID: 15533047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tandem mass spectrometry of intact GroEL-substrate complexes reveals substrate-specific conformational changes in the trans ring.
van Duijn E; Simmons DA; van den Heuvel RH; Bakkes PJ; van Heerikhuizen H; Heeren RM; Robinson CV; van der Vies SM; Heck AJ
J Am Chem Soc; 2006 Apr; 128(14):4694-702. PubMed ID: 16594706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
