These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9709445)

  • 1. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.
    Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA
    Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gains and losses in action memory.
    Engelkamp J; Seiler KH
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):829-48. PubMed ID: 12850992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing.
    Burns DJ; Hebert T
    Memory; 2005 Feb; 13(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15847230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of environmental context on recall and category clustering scores following relational and individual item processing: a test of the outshining hypothesis.
    Cousins R; Hanley JR
    Memory; 1996 Jan; 4(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 8821087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Order information and free recall: evaluating the item-order hypothesis.
    Mulligan NW; Lozito JP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 May; 60(5):732-51. PubMed ID: 17455079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of item and relational processing on incidental long-term memory for order.
    Tehan G; Fallon AB; Randall N
    Memory; 1997 Jul; 5(4):457-82. PubMed ID: 9282219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of distinctive processing manipulations on older adults' false memory.
    Butler KM; McDaniel MA; McCabe DP; Dornburg CC
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 Mar; 17(2):129-59. PubMed ID: 19642045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions.
    Golly-Haring C; Engelkamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):965-75. PubMed ID: 14516228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory.
    von Essen JD
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 16014075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory in pregnancy and post-partum: Item specific and relational encoding processes in recall and recognition.
    Spataro P; Saraulli D; Oriolo D; Costanzi M; Zanetti H; Cestari V; Rossi-Arnaud C
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 57(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 27197632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Directed forgetting: further comparisons of the item and list methods.
    Basden BH; Basden DR
    Memory; 1996 Nov; 4(6):633-53. PubMed ID: 8934458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age differences in the effect of encoding congruence on incidental free and cued recall.
    Erber JT
    Exp Aging Res; 1984; 10(4):221-3. PubMed ID: 6535735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Item and relational processing in young and older adults.
    Fisher LM; McDowd JM
    J Gerontol; 1993 Mar; 48(2):P62-8. PubMed ID: 8473699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Episodic recall with special reference to German contributions].
    Engelkamp J
    Z Exp Psychol; 2000; 47(4):253-68. PubMed ID: 11132402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models.
    Kahana MJ; Rizzuto DS; Schneider AR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):933-53. PubMed ID: 16248743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does creating a concept map affect item-specific encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Poston L; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1049-61. PubMed ID: 25528090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relational and item-specific information as determinants of category superiority effects.
    Sharps MJ; Wilson-Leff CA; Price JL
    J Gen Psychol; 1995 Jul; 122(3):271-85. PubMed ID: 7650521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.