These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9709835)

  • 21. Effect of enamel etching on tensile bond strength of brackets bonded in vivo with a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
    Rosenbach G; Cal-Neto JP; Oliveira SR; Chevitarese O; Almeida MA
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 17029543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of sandblasting on the retention of orthodontic bands.
    Wood DP; Paleczny GJ; Johnson LN
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 8805916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orthodontic band retention on primary molar stainless steel crowns.
    Beemer RL; Ferracane JL; Howard HE
    Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(6):408-13. PubMed ID: 8153003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 19793779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
    Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adhesive thickness effects on the bond strength of a light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Arici S; Caniklioglu CM; Arici N; Ozer M; Oguz B
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 15825792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bond strength of brackets cemented with light-cured glass-ionomer cements to contaminated enamel.
    Itoh T; Fukushima T; Inoue Y; Matsuo N; Matsumoto M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 11763927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tensile and shear strength of orthodontic bracket bonding with glass ionomer cement and acrylic resin. An in vitro comparison.
    Norevall LI; Sjögren G; Persson M
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(6):275-84. PubMed ID: 2096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison between zinc polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cement in the orthodontic band cementation.
    Dincer B; Erdinc AM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 11990053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth.
    Terata R; Nakashima K; Kubota M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 11763933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The relative shear bond strength of visible light-curing and chemically curing glass-ionomer cement to composite resin.
    Kerby RE; Knobloch L
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):641-4. PubMed ID: 1287717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on the retentive strength of orthodontic bands on gold alloy crowns.
    Youn YA; Lee YK; Lee DY; Kim NY; Lim YK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):728.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18068585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An investigation into the use of two polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers) and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement used to retain orthodontic bands.
    Williams PH; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 15947223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of shear-peel band strengths of 5 orthodontic cements.
    Aggarwal M; Foley TF; Rix D
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 10961781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC; Büchler A
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-releasing cements.
    Norris DS; McInnes-Ledoux P; Schwaninger B; Weinberg R
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Mar; 89(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 3513596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diametral tensile strength and bonding to dentin of type I glass ionomer cements.
    Galun EA; Saleh N; Lewinstein I
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 7990049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Band cementation with a no-mix, light-cured glass ionomer cement.
    Moskowitz EM; Muñoz AM; Tovilo K
    J Clin Orthod; 1996 Oct; 30(10):576-7. PubMed ID: 10356475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A clinical comparison of different powder: liquid ratios of two glass ionomer cements on the retention of orthodontic molar bands.
    Fricker JP
    Aust Orthod J; 1989 Oct; 11(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 2639660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.