BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9710549)

  • 1. Information, Strategic Behavior, and Fairness in Ultimatum Bargaining: An Experimental Study.
    Güth W; van Damme E
    J Math Psychol; 1998 Jun; 42(2/3):227-47. PubMed ID: 9710549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serum omega-3 fatty acids are associated with ultimatum bargaining behavior.
    Emanuele E; Brondino N; Re S; Bertona M; Geroldi D
    Physiol Behav; 2009 Jan; 96(1):180-3. PubMed ID: 18940191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short- and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior.
    Espín AM; Exadaktylos F; Herrmann B; Brañas-Garza P
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():214. PubMed ID: 26347625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between platelet serotonin content and rejections of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Emanuele E; Brondino N; Bertona M; Re S; Geroldi D
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 437(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 18448251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.
    Nowak MA; Page KM; Sigmund K
    Science; 2000 Sep; 289(5485):1773-5. PubMed ID: 10976075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men's decisions in ultimatum games.
    Van den Bergh B; Dewitte S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Aug; 273(1597):2091-5. PubMed ID: 16846918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Random allocation of pies promotes the evolution of fairness in the Ultimatum Game.
    Wang X; Chen X; Wang L
    Sci Rep; 2014 Apr; 4():4534. PubMed ID: 24686840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do people reject unintended inequity? Responders' rejection in a truncated ultimatum game.
    Ohmura Y; Yamagishi T
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Apr; 96(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 15941131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empathy leads to fairness.
    Page KM; Nowak MA
    Bull Math Biol; 2002 Nov; 64(6):1101-16. PubMed ID: 12508533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social learning in the ultimatum game.
    Zhang B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74540. PubMed ID: 24023950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reciprocity and identity protection: reasons for rejection in the ultimatum game].
    Horita Y; Yamagishi T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Oct; 78(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 18027592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local competition sparks concerns for fairness in the ultimatum game.
    Barclay P; Stoller B
    Biol Lett; 2014 May; 10(5):20140213. PubMed ID: 24850897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultimatum bargaining behavior of people affected by schizophrenia.
    Agay N; Kron S; Carmel Z; Mendlovic S; Levkovitz Y
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Jan; 157(1-3):39-46. PubMed ID: 17916386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social opportunities and the evolution of fairness.
    André JB; Baumard N
    J Theor Biol; 2011 Nov; 289():128-35. PubMed ID: 21907216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do sex and age affect strategic behavior and inequity aversion in children?
    Bueno-Guerra N; Leiva D; Colell M; Call J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():285-300. PubMed ID: 27372561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
    Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bargaining over waiting time in ultimatum game experiments.
    Berger R; Rauhut H; Prade S; Helbing D
    Soc Sci Res; 2012 Mar; 41(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 23017758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical fluctuations in population bargaining in the ultimatum game: static and evolutionary aspects.
    da Silva R; Kellermann GA; Lamb LC
    J Theor Biol; 2009 May; 258(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 19490871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of dopaminergic gene variants on decision making in the ultimatum game.
    Reuter M; Felten A; Penz S; Mainzer A; Markett S; Montag C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():242. PubMed ID: 23759976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.