BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9710817)

  • 1. Computer-generated study of the correlation between tooth, face, arch forms, and palatal contour.
    Sellen PN; Jagger DC; Harrison A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 9710817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studying the relationships between the outlines of the face, maxillary central incisor, and maxillary arch in Jordanian adults by using Fourier analysis.
    Shaweesh AI; Al-Dwairi ZN; Shamkhey HD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 25444285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The correlation between selected factors which influence dental aesthetics.
    Sellen P; Jagger D; Harrison A
    Prim Dent Care; 1998 Apr; 5(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 9656937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-based evaluation of gender identification and morphologic classification of tooth face and arch forms.
    Berksun S; Hasanreisoğlu U; Gökdeniz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 12488849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical study to evaluate the correlation between maxillary central incisor tooth form and face form in an Indian population.
    Koralakunte PR; Budihal DH
    J Oral Sci; 2012 Sep; 54(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 23047039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the selection of maxillary anterior teeth using intraoral and extraoral anatomical landmarks.
    Ellakwa A; McNamara K; Sandhu J; James K; Arora A; Klineberg I; El-Sheikh A; Martin FE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):414-21. PubMed ID: 22269230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender identification and morphologic classification of tooth, arch and palatal forms in Saudi population.
    Mohammad A; Koralakunte PR
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2015 Aug; 7(Suppl 2):S486-90. PubMed ID: 26538903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the Association of Tooth Form of Maxillary Central Incisors with Face Shape Using AutoCAD Software: A Descriptive Study.
    Mehndiratta A; Bembalagi M; Patil R
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e469-e472. PubMed ID: 29280304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between incisal embrasures of natural and prosthetically restored maxillary anterior teeth.
    Baharav H; Kupershmit I; Oman M; Cardash H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 19231573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models: an in vivo study.
    Zhongpeng Y; Tianmin X; Ruoping J
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 31029133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Three Digitization Methods for the Dental Arch with Various Tooth Preparation Designs: An In Vitro Study.
    Oh KC; Lee B; Park YB; Moon HS
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 30427097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of dental arch reproduction using three-dimensional optical digitization.
    Brosky ME; Major RJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov; 90(5):434-40. PubMed ID: 14586306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
    Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The face-form as a guide for the selection of maxillary central incisors.
    Mavroskoufis F; Ritchie GM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 May; 43(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 6988576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between pterygomaxillary notches and maxillary anterior teeth.
    Guldag MU; Büyükkaplan US; Sentut F; Ceylan G
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 20040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tooth-position, arch-size, and arch-shape in the primary dentition.
    Tsai HH
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(1):17-22, 10. PubMed ID: 11324401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Frank RP; Thielke SM; Johnson GH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11807479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tooth size and dental arch dimensions: a stereophotogrammetric study in Southeast Asian Malays.
    Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Anderson PJ; Townsend GC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 22008304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.