These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9710834)

  • 1. A universal boxing procedure: irreversible hydrocolloid and magnetic strip.
    NaBadalung DP; Connelly ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):262-4. PubMed ID: 9710834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simplified procedure for boxing elastomeric impressions.
    Clear KE; Hansen CA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 75(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 8642536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disinfection procedures: their efficacy and effect on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Rentzia A; Coleman DC; O'Donnell MJ; Dowling AH; O'Sullivan M
    J Dent; 2011 Feb; 39(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 21093528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and bond strength of reversible with irreversible hydrocolloid impression systems: a comparative study.
    Heisler WH; Tjan AH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):578-84. PubMed ID: 1403933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Frank RP; Thielke SM; Johnson GH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11807479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does 6 Hours of Contact With Alginate Impression Material Affect Dental Cast Properties?
    Ibrahim AA; Alhajj MN; Khalifa N; Gilada MW
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2017 Jun; 38(6):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 28586232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy of 2 irreversible hydrocolloid alternative impression materials with immediate and delayed pouring.
    Nassar U; Hussein B; Oko A; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2012; 78():c2. PubMed ID: 22322019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A boxing technique for irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Machnee CH; Loney RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Nov; 62(5):610-2. PubMed ID: 2691666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation into the compatibility of some irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and dental gypsum products. Part II. A refined discriminatory procedure.
    Owen CP
    J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Mar; 13(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 3514824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloids (alginates) for fixed prosthodontics. A comparison between irreversible hydrocolloid, reversible hydrocolloid, and addition silicone for use in the syringe-tray technique.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Apr; 106(2 Pt 1):651-60. PubMed ID: 9584912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Irreversible hydrocolloids for crown and bridge impressions: effect of different treatments on compatibility of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with type IV gypsums.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Lindén LA
    Dent Mater; 1996 Mar; 12(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 9002847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Check bite impressions using irreversible alginate/reversible hydrocolloid combination.
    Scott GK; Hawkins L; Chetwyn J; Doughty T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jan; 77(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 9029470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vertical distortion in distal extension ridges and palatal area of casts made by different techniques.
    Wang HY; Lu YC; Shiau YY; Tsou D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 8648579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of disinfection on irreversible hydrocolloid and alternative impression materials and the resultant gypsum casts.
    Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 23031732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and dimensional stability of a combined hydrocolloid impression system.
    Peters MC; Tieleman A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jun; 67(6):873-8. PubMed ID: 1403882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new simplified beading and boxing procedure for elastic impression.
    Vyas A; Maru K; Bali SK; Jain S; Shukla J; Kataria N
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2011 Mar; 11(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 22379306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptation of finger-smoothed irreversible hydrocolloid to impression surfaces.
    Lim PF; Neo KH; Sitoh L; Yeo KL; Stokes A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7575961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.