These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9710863)

  • 1. Comparison of a computerized physical activity recall with a triaxial motion sensor in middle-school youth.
    McMurray RG; Harrell JS; Bradley CB; Webb JP; Goodman EM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1998 Aug; 30(8):1238-45. PubMed ID: 9710863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Field evaluation of energy expenditure in women using Tritrac accelerometers.
    Campbell KL; Crocker PR; McKenzie DC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Oct; 34(10):1667-74. PubMed ID: 12370570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy of the TriTrac-R3D accelerometer to estimate energy expenditure.
    Jakicic JM; Winters C; Lagally K; Ho J; Robertson RJ; Wing RR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 May; 31(5):747-54. PubMed ID: 10331898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Field trial of a three-dimensional activity monitor: comparison with self report.
    Matthews CE; Freedson PS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Jul; 27(7):1071-8. PubMed ID: 7564975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the TriTrac-R3D accelerometer and a self-report activity diary with heart-rate monitoring for the assessment of energy expenditure in children.
    Rodriguez G; Béghin L; Michaud L; Moreno LA; Turck D; Gottrand F
    Br J Nutr; 2002 Jun; 87(6):623-31. PubMed ID: 12067433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity.
    Nichols JF; Morgan CG; Sarkin JA; Sallis JF; Calfas KJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 Jun; 31(6):908-12. PubMed ID: 10378921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving energy expenditure estimation by using a triaxial accelerometer.
    Chen KY; Sun M
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 1997 Dec; 83(6):2112-22. PubMed ID: 9390989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of activity monitors to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise.
    King GA; Torres N; Potter C; Brooks TJ; Coleman KJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Jul; 36(7):1244-51. PubMed ID: 15235333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Youth recall and TriTrac accelerometer estimates of physical activity levels.
    Cradock AL; Wiecha JL; Peterson KE; Sobol AM; Colditz GA; Gortmaker SL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Mar; 36(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 15076797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physical activity-related energy expenditure with the RT3 and TriTrac accelerometers in overweight adults.
    Jacobi D; Perrin AE; Grosman N; Doré MF; Normand S; Oppert JM; Simon C
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2007 Apr; 15(4):950-6. PubMed ID: 17426330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reliability, validity, and stability of a measure of physical activity in the elderly.
    Kochersberger G; McConnell E; Kuchibhatla MN; Pieper C
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Aug; 77(8):793-5. PubMed ID: 8702373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The validity of the Tritrac-R3D Activity Monitor for the assessment of physical activity in children.
    Welk GJ; Corbin CB
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1995 Sep; 66(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 7481081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and validity of the tritrac-R3D accelerometer during backpacking: a case study.
    DeVoe D; Dalleck L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Aug; 93(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11693704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of methods to estimate physical activity and energy expenditure in African American children.
    Ramírez-Marrero FA; Smith BA; Sherman WM; Kirby TE
    Int J Sports Med; 2005 Jun; 26(5):363-71. PubMed ID: 15895319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitating physical activity in COPD using a triaxial accelerometer.
    Steele BG; Holt L; Belza B; Ferris S; Lakshminaryan S; Buchner DM
    Chest; 2000 May; 117(5):1359-67. PubMed ID: 10807823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of energy expenditure estimates from doubly labeled water, a physical activity questionnaire, and physical activity records.
    Conway JM; Seale JL; Jacobs DR; Irwin ML; Ainsworth BE
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2002 Mar; 75(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 11864858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of four methods of estimating physical activity in adult women.
    Leenders NYJM ; Sherman WM; Nagaraja HN
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Jul; 32(7):1320-6. PubMed ID: 10912900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the telephone and in-person interview versions of the 7-day PAR.
    Hayden-Wade HA; Coleman KJ; Sallis JF; Armstrong C
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):801-9. PubMed ID: 12750590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth.
    Weston AT; Petosa R; Pate RR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1997 Jan; 29(1):138-43. PubMed ID: 9000167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a commercial accelerometer (Tritrac-R3 D) to measure energy expenditure during ambulation.
    Sherman WM; Morris DM; Kirby TE; Petosa RA; Smith BA; Frid DJ; Leenders N
    Int J Sports Med; 1998 Jan; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 9506799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.