123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9711281)
1. [A comparison of the monitor and alternator findings of digital thoracic images with the aid of a computer-supported procedure].
Heckermann D; Fink U; Schätzl M; Fink B; Kenn W; Miller P; Pistitsch C; Herrmann K; Reiser M
Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 9711281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology.
Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Kheddache S; Svensson S; Tingberg A; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):45-52. PubMed ID: 15933080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; John V; Gocke P
Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Documentation with a digital image workstation].
Fiebich M; Wiesmann W; Peters PE
Radiologe; 1994 Jun; 34(6):317-22. PubMed ID: 8090870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Time needs in evaluating digital thoracic images on the monitor in comparison with alternator].
Herrmann KA; Bonél HM; Stäbler A; Matzko M; Waggershauser T; Sittek H; Reiser MF
Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 53(6):260-5. PubMed ID: 11402875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast mapping and evaluation for electronic X-ray images on CRT display monitor.
Suzuki J; Furukawa I; Ono S; Kitamura M; Ando Y
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):772-84. PubMed ID: 9533578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of an automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiographs].
Abe K; Katsuragawa S; Sasaki Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 52(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 1561056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
Goo JM; Choi JY; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Han D; Park SH; Kim JH; Nam SH
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of conventional film, CR hard copy and PACS soft copy images of the chest: analyses of ROC curves and inter-observer agreement.
Weatherburn GC; Ridout D; Strickland NH; Robins P; Glastonbury CM; Curati W; Harvey C; Shadbolt C
Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 12927664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Hard-copy (film) versus soft-copy (CRT) reading performance between compressed and uncompressed images: SOLs in abdominal CT images].
Ando Y; Tsukamoto N; Kawaguchi O; Kitamura M; Kunieda E; Kubo A; Ogasawara K; Kinosada Y; Maeda T; Kozuka T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Sep; 59(11):521-5. PubMed ID: 10536448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved visualization of stimulated nodules by adaptive enhancement of digital chest radiography.
Kim JH; Im JG; Han MC; Min BG; Lee CW
Acad Radiol; 1994 Oct; 1(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9419471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The detectability of osteoarticular lesions of the extremities on the television monitor].
Salvini E; Zincone G; Macchi I; Mariani AM; Crespi A; Paruccini N
Radiol Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):401-4. PubMed ID: 8190921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative findings of digital thoracic images and digital images of statistical phantoms as film copy, a radiological work station and a PC].
Ricke J; Wolf M; Zielinski C; Hosten N; Liebig T; Amthauer H; Hänninen EL; Schumacher T; Stroszczynski C; Bergh B; Emmel D; Schauer W
Rofo; 1998 Mar; 168(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 9551113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of nodule location.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Flinck A; Ullman G; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):92-6. PubMed ID: 15933087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Quantitative analysis of clinical usefulness of CRT monitor diagnosis by using previous and current chest images with simulated lung nodules].
Sasaki Y; Katsuragawa S; Yoneda Y; Takeda S; Yanagisawa T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Apr; 56(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 8692651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
